Nosferatu
Well-Known Member
well, in my example, I used a 2000-2009 restriction... and then if we use genres or other categories as "positions" then we are comparing similar movies to similar movies... there will always be a case that someone didn't see a movie, but let them subjectively pick which is better...
Again, all our mocks are subjective... and chances are if we redid ALL of our playoffs, the majority of them would have gone a different way...
I disagree with everything you said, subjective? Not really, there is a reason the same people won over and over again the first couple years of the draft. Also, they would not go another way unless we went back and voted on them now then I agree because most of you guys would make sure Troy and I didn't win so much.
With a sports draft Hank Aaron is better than Tom Brunansky, everyone knows that thats ever watched the game and their stats help show that. With movies you don't have that, it is completely subjective, like I said another favorite movie of mine is Double Indemnity, again I bet half of you have no idea what the movie is about or whos in it or when it came out but all of you are gonna know Dark Knight and would vote for Dark Knight because you have heard of it and know what its about.