broncosmitty
Banned in Europe
Solid edit.Nobody has bent any rules, you simply dont understand a rule.
Am I OTC?
Solid edit.Nobody has bent any rules, you simply dont understand a rule.
Good dealDone!
Larkin is a welcome addition.
Quasi homer pick for me as well, even better.
YepSolid edit.
Am I OTC?
Nobody has bent any rules, you simply dont understand a rule.
At the end of this draft, Ritz is gonna have 6 players on his roster from Bucket 2. That's fair according to you. If my original trade went through. I would have had 5 players from Bucket 2. But that isn't allowed. No, I don't understand at allNobody has bent any rules, you simply dont understand a rule.
At the end of this draft, Ritz is gonna have 6 players on his roster from Bucket 2. That's fair according to you. If my original trade went through. I would have had 5 players from Bucket 2. But that isn't allowed. No, I don't understand at all
Either way, Smittty accepted Larkin 2 I'm deal. Done
I do understand, it's just Bullshit. If you can't trade an already drafted player for an already drafted player because you'd have one evtra pick in bucket 2, then all the traded that have given people 5 or even 6 Bucket 2's shouldn't be allowed. No one one is fair if the other isn't. As I said, Larkin is included. Lets drop itAgain you are not looking at this the right way. It has nothing to do with how many players you have per bucket, you can literally have 15 bucket 2 picks if you traded with other teams and added an addition 11 bucket 2 picks to your team.
Stop thinking about this as a limit in a bucket. Once a player is drafted he does NOT lose his bucket, for instance Sandy Koufax is still a bucket 2 player, if he is traded the team getting Koufax in the trade must have a bucket 2 pick left to accept him in a deal, i'm honestly shocked you don't understand this.
I do understand, it's just Bullshit. If you can't trade an already drafted player for an already drafted player because you'd have one evtra pick in bucket 2, then all the traded that have given people 5 or even 6 Bucket 2's shouldn't be allowed. No one one is fair if the other isn't. As I said, Larkin is included. Lets drop it
I'm not missing a f'ing thing. One loophole is ok, the other isn't. I've already traded another player to make the thing work, what else is thereYou can not trade for a player say babe Ruth if you don't have a bucket 1 to spend on him. There is no rule saying you can only have 4 per bucket. I have no bucket 1's left meaning I can't trade for a player who is a bucket 1. We are talking about two separate things. UK is just missing the topic which isn't his fault just a miscommunication. I'm a teacher trust me people have different ways of viewing/understanding things.
Holy freaking cow. You were right, I was wrong, the trade is fixed my badI'm not dropping it because you are mad at something you are obviously not understanding. I'm not sure whats so hard about understanding in order to accept a player in a trade you must have a pick left in said players bucket. Everything else you are talking about makes zero sense.
Using your logic why have buckets at all if we can just have a player on our team and not have him assigned a correct bucket...
I'm not missing a f'ing thing. One loophole is ok, the other isn't. I've already traded another player to make the thing work, what else is there
I'm not complaining or anything, but don't I only need TWO #5's, since I already had Molitor and traded Gwynn? I needed one, but now I need three according to my team dealy.
No objection to whatever it ends up, just curious as we move forward.
Thank you for keeping all this shit straight Nos.