SlinkyRedfoot
Well-Known Member
I just looked at those forms that were posted. It appears the one that was dated 10/25/2015 was from the day of the investigation & the one dated 10/26/2015 was from the follow-up investigation the next day.
It appears that the officer started to fill out an arrest form, then changed his mind & crossed out the first few lines of the form & didn't fill out the rest. This tells me that one of two things occurred:
1) Either they had come to possibly arrest Zach, but the situation had calmed down & they felt there was no need to make an arrest; or,
2) The officer was just making his follow-up visit & accidentally grabbed the wrong form, so he marked through the lines he had begun to fill out & didn't complete the rest of the form.
This seems to confirm that no arrest was made on either the 25th or the 26th, and may actually explain Meyer's perceived faux pas during Big 10 Media Day.
Police departments tend to number their reports. The officer probably didn't want to turn in an out-of-sequence report at a later date or have to explain a missing report, so he likely turned it in as-is & gave a verbal explanation for doing so. That would also explain the police chief's statement that if such a report existed, it was a mistake.
^Urban Meyer ball washer^
Did I do that right, @Red_Alert?