- Thread starter
- #1
Battlelyon
2021 Super Bowl Champions Rams
And Klingsbury
Last edited:
How is Kingsbury on McVays coaching tree?
And Klingsbury
Sapling is producing
And Klingsbury
That is why i put and Klingsbury in the bottom of post. He is not McVay’s coaching treeHow is Kingsbury on McVays coaching tree?
I agree with this!Someone with an 0-1 Super Bowl record doesn't have a "coaching tree". Maybe a patch of dirt.
BingoMcVay, LaFleur and K. Shanahan all have ties back to WFT and probably were molded there for the "young offensive minds".
They already better than Belichick tree, hell we have to wait a long time for Belichick to even get to a winning record without Brady. Let me know when thst happens or for Belichick to accomplish anything without Brady.Someone with an 0-1 Super Bowl record doesn't have a "coaching tree". Maybe a patch of dirt.
They already better than Belichick tree, hell we have to wait a long time for Belichick to even get to a winning record without Brady. Let me know when thst happens or for Belichick to accomplish anything without Brady.
While these guys on the other hand are just getting started.
Thanks to Brady, losing coach without. Congrats to the Patriots on besting two 1 win teams this yearSays something about Belichick as a HC. He's doing it with mediocre assistants.
Besides, Bill has 8 Super Bowl rings which pretty much trumps everything.
/threadSomeone with an 0-1 Super Bowl record doesn't have a "coaching tree". Maybe a patch of dirt.
You know what. I think you have a point. Seriously, I'm starting to think I may agree with you. Because I look at what TB12 did going with a 7-9 Bucs team with Bruce Arians as HC. The same roster, they won a SB. Yeah, that's pretty much Brady.Thanks to Brady, losing coach without. Congrats to the Patriots on besting two 1 win teams this year
If Belichick finds success without Brady, than nobody can say anything. Mac Jones looks to have a bright future, so certainly will help find success for the Patriots. Brady has proven he can win without Belichick, now this is Belichick's turn. If he does, he will arguably be the best coach in history, and not much in the way of arguments can be made against him. Fairly or not, he should prove that he can win without BradyYou know what. I think you have a point. Seriously, I'm starting to think I may agree with you. Because I look at what TB12 did going with a 7-9 Bucs team with Bruce Arians as HC. The same roster, they won a SB. Yeah, that's pretty much Brady.
So to this point, I think it's easy to credit 6 of Bill's 8 rings to Brady. But let's see how this plays out with the Pats over the next few years. Because Bill is hanging around until he buries Shula's all-time wins record.
But another Hall of Fame HC, Parcells didn't win a Super Bowl without Little Bill. You can't disregard this. Both Bill's are assholes. Like the great Steve DeOssie said, "I hate Bill every day other than Sunday".
I'd say both Belichick and Brady would have won a couple of Super Bowls without each other over the last 20 years. But not 6.
This is Battlelyon we're talking about. He could polish a terd if it had LA in it.Someone with an 0-1 Super Bowl record doesn't have a "coaching tree". Maybe a patch of dirt.
The derp is strong in this one.That is why i put and Klingsbury in the bottom of post. He is not McVay’s coaching tree