TKOSpikes
Well-Known Member
I hear that micro.
Oh, and Joe, excellent intro btw. Laid out perfectly.
Oh, and Joe, excellent intro btw. Laid out perfectly.
To Sam's point, over the years, some have left the MBBRL (DUB), some have not migrated over from CBS (Hawk & dog), and others have taken a temporary leave of absence (Scape & Wil).
If that is the purpose of oblivion, then I can see "the reason" for wanting to add it.
In pure Yogi Berra style, if "fantasy football is 90% luck and the other half is skill"... it would seem most unfortunate that the two of the most unlucky teams would be replaced just to make room for other owners to return.
And if this turns into a money league - I'm out.
I love Fuzzy's post, but it also makes me wonder if it really is a punishment per se? I can't think of any owner in this league that I would not vote to bring back. And that brings up another question: who decides in the end? Is it a vote, or is it Treff's call?
I find it hard to believe that this would take place just for that purpose.
I find it hard to believe that this would take place just for that purpose.
Won't be a league with half drones. 12 people, or none..well maybe one drone wouldn't be terrible. The continuity of the the leagues has to be maintained or else the third league is just another league with no connections. If it's connected to the first 2.. . It MUST be the same. That's the reason why.I am sure the discussion will increase as we know how many owners are interested to be the replacement for the so called oblivion owners... But i dont understand why if we do make a 3rd league why it MUST be the same as A and B... a league with half Drones, is not going to be fun for anyone...
Won't be a league with half drones. 12 people, or none..well maybe one drone wouldn't be terrible. The continuity of the the leagues has to be maintained or else the third league is just another league with no connections. If it's connected to the first 2.. . It MUST be the same. That's the reason why.
We want to keep the competitive nature of MBBRL. I would think that scrapping the Oblivion punishment would be appropriate. The reasons for oblivion should be inactivity, poor behavior, etc. not one year's poor performance. Will's concept of putting together a group of guys who like to post and play has worked great to this point, but I am afraid that our pool of qualified participants is narrow and we don't want to toss out guys that are really interested and trying. I think that it is natural to assume we will have a little attrition each year anyway which would allow new blood.
that my 2 cents
To Sam's point, over the years, some have left the MBBRL (DUB), some have not migrated over from CBS (Hawk & dog), and others have taken a temporary leave of absence (Scape & Wil).
If that is the purpose of oblivion, then I can see "the reason" for wanting to add it.
In pure Yogi Berra style, if "fantasy football is 90% luck and the other half is skill"... it would seem most unfortunate that the two of the most unlucky teams would be replaced just to make room for other owners to return.
And if this turns into a money league - I'm out.
I am sure the discussion will increase as we know how many owners are interested to be the replacement for the so called oblivion owners... But i dont understand why if we do make a 3rd league why it MUST be the same as A and B... a league with half Drones, is not going to be fun for anyone...
The reason for oblivion: sometimes people seem like pretty good owners in pre-season, but end up not taking care of their teams, and - just as bad - not posting. Usually the two go hand in hand. But even if their team was awful they could still say "sure" in the exciting days of next August and re-up, and run their team the same way again, while guys like Shady or Nos would be left out. The "oblivion" rule is a chance for not-really-interested owners to drop out naturally rather than having to be voted out. And if for some reason everybody wanted them back instead, they could come back.
Not being active on the boards doesn't feel like a good reason to kick someone out, but if they're out because that's how the rules went, it's a legit consideration for whether they make it back in.
Now, if at the end of the year the A leaguers really hate to see the bottom two guys go of course they could be voted back in, and it probably also means the B league is in good shape. And if there are a few more guys we'd really like to bring in, a C league would make sense. But it should be set up identical to the A and B leagues, even if there end up being a few drones. Drones are better than bad owners. (The problem is that it won't be much fun to run.)
It's not really about expansion, or about punishment, or about a path back in, but about maintaining a critical mass of quality players/posters in the MBBRL, whatever size it is.
As to who votes on who gets in, regardless of the situation... I think everybody in the A and B leagues should vote, but votes should get multiplied by the number of years in the league. (Those here the longest have the most at stake.)
As the last place team in the B league, I knew the rules going in. Anybody that has played in fantasy leagues with me before knows that I don't make many moves through out the season, but before this year I normally had good teams. In the years that I had a bad team in a league I was trying to end my opponents playoff chances, so the final week of this season my team while be the best I can get and I will be watching the score.
When talking about a C league, you have to ask at what point does it start to get watered down. I enjoy this league because it seems to be a higher level of talent then my normal leagues. Like anything else expansion dilutes the talent level of the players.