- Thread starter
- #1
seahawksfan234
Radical Moderate
Please, someone try to explain the logic of this trade, because I absolutely fail to understand it whatsoever. Trade r*pe is an understatement here.
The trade can be broken down in two elements:
Wade Miley v. Roenis Elias:
I am biased towards Roenis Elias, so I'll try to set that aside in this evaluation.
Age:
Elias: 27
Miley: 29
Winner: Elias by a slim margin
Cost:
Elias: Not eligible for arbitration until 2018 I believe
Miley: $15m owed over 2016-2017
Winner: Elias is substantially cheaper and under team control longer
Previous performance:
Elias: 3.97 ERA over the past two years (49 starts)
Miley: 4.40 ERA over the past two years (65 starts)
Winner: Elias by a solid margin
Projected future performance:
Elias: This is where people will differ with me, I believe Elias will continue pitching at this level, but unlikely to get much better with a higher chance of regression than improving.
Miley: Could improve in a pitchers park, but I find it highly unlikely he does much better than Elias.
Winner: Split
Verdict: This part of the trade really depends on what you think of Elias v. Miley. Based on Elias' high possibility of regression versus Miley being a more consistent option, I would personally take Elias but I could see how one would prefer Miley. Either way, neither one is significantly better than the other.
Carson Smith v. Jonathan Aro
This one is not even close and I'm not even going to go in depth as I did with Elias v. Miley. Carson looks like he could be a dominant reliever, whereas Jonathan Aro looks like he could be DFA'd any day now. The only way to justify Carson Smith for Jonathan Aro is if the Mariners were receiving a very substantial return on what they received for Elias.
Verdict: Carson by a ridiculously wide margin, not even fucking close and anyone who would argue otherwise is an idiot.
What the fuck was Dipoto thinking? Unless Miley somehow turns into an ace overnight and Aro somehow becomes a 2.00 ERA type pitcher, this pitcher will be a massive failure and there is nothing to indicate the previous two points will happen.
The trade can be broken down in two elements:
Wade Miley v. Roenis Elias:
I am biased towards Roenis Elias, so I'll try to set that aside in this evaluation.
Age:
Elias: 27
Miley: 29
Winner: Elias by a slim margin
Cost:
Elias: Not eligible for arbitration until 2018 I believe
Miley: $15m owed over 2016-2017
Winner: Elias is substantially cheaper and under team control longer
Previous performance:
Elias: 3.97 ERA over the past two years (49 starts)
Miley: 4.40 ERA over the past two years (65 starts)
Winner: Elias by a solid margin
Projected future performance:
Elias: This is where people will differ with me, I believe Elias will continue pitching at this level, but unlikely to get much better with a higher chance of regression than improving.
Miley: Could improve in a pitchers park, but I find it highly unlikely he does much better than Elias.
Winner: Split
Verdict: This part of the trade really depends on what you think of Elias v. Miley. Based on Elias' high possibility of regression versus Miley being a more consistent option, I would personally take Elias but I could see how one would prefer Miley. Either way, neither one is significantly better than the other.
Carson Smith v. Jonathan Aro
This one is not even close and I'm not even going to go in depth as I did with Elias v. Miley. Carson looks like he could be a dominant reliever, whereas Jonathan Aro looks like he could be DFA'd any day now. The only way to justify Carson Smith for Jonathan Aro is if the Mariners were receiving a very substantial return on what they received for Elias.
Verdict: Carson by a ridiculously wide margin, not even fucking close and anyone who would argue otherwise is an idiot.
What the fuck was Dipoto thinking? Unless Miley somehow turns into an ace overnight and Aro somehow becomes a 2.00 ERA type pitcher, this pitcher will be a massive failure and there is nothing to indicate the previous two points will happen.