Skin'EmAll
Celebrity Troublemaker
to get both it would take gutting the draft which precludes adding anything more next year . add to it Tee wasnt on the market tee can make that difference next year
if he decides to play here, i hope he does
to get both it would take gutting the draft which precludes adding anything more next year . add to it Tee wasnt on the market tee can make that difference next year
I think it was more than Jordan and Brady but I can't remember the names right now. Some of the guys the Redskins signed this year probably took a little less to come here.Tim Duncan also took less money to make it easier go si other players. And from what I read. Both Parker n Ginoboli followed his lead.
You don't have yo apologize for not using that shitty néw name. I call em the Skins, probably always will even if they go with Warriors, the only real choice with some panache. Unless they go back to Redskins which I personally don't see happening.You guys realize that Quinyon Mitchell had no passes thrown in his direction by the Skins (sorry Commanders does not sit well with me as their name), the week before CD Lamb caught 5 passes for 26 yards against Mitchell. On the other side, you have Cooper Dejean, who is playing very close to the same level as Mitchell. Finally, the Eagles have CB's that can play.
If I remember correctly Terry McLaurin, who always kills the Eagles had 1 catch for 5 yards. Who knows, next time he may go off on them (hope not).
Is that the criteria now. Acquiring only players who will put the Skins in the Super Bowl. In the year they were acquired. Does that go for drafted players n FA signees. Or just players you didn't want the Skins to trade for preferring instead to put a GI Joe with the Kung Fu grip on 'resources' as you called them.do lattimore and higgins put us in the superbowl this year ? if not then that is the reason you dont overpay in resources (and possibly contract too ) to do that when you can assess the options at the end of the season . besides that you can only get one of them in real life this year . add to it BOTH were injured (one still is ) those 3 games injured for hill would have been vs the steelers and i think ravens (not sure about that one )
no but if gutting drafts is a part of acquiring players who cant put us there , then its a bad deal . do i have to go through the littany of 3rd , 4th , 5th round picks who have made names for themselves ?Is that the criteria now. Acquiring only players who will put the Skins in the Super Bowl. In the year they were acquired. Does that go for drafted players n FA signees. Or just players you didn't want the Skins to trade for preferring instead to put a GI Joe with the Kung Fu grip on 'resources' as you called them.
Was the 3rd, 4th n 5th rd draft picks too valuable a resource to waste on Lattimore. Never mind the fact that the Skins haven't had a CB capable of single coverage on #1 WRs for an entire game since Darrell Green.
I always worried about him going off on our secondary. Hell, he still might.You don't have yo apologize for not using that shitty néw name. I call em the Skins, probably always will even if they go with Warriors, the only real choice with some panache. Unless they go back to Redskins which I personally don't see happening.
Yeah, TM"s had some good games against the Eagles. And it was 1 rec for 10 yards.
Yeah, From all reports the rookie CB more than held his own against Terry Mac so real props to him. Hopefully some get back is in order when the Skins/Birds get together for round 2.I always worried about him going off on our secondary. Hell, he still might.
I hope not, but, if you guys want, we can use him. What a 3 headed monster we would haveYeah, From all reports the rookie CB more than held his own against Terry Mac so real props to him. Hopefully some get back is in order when the Skins/Birds get together for round 2.
Heh. There are Skins fans that aren't so high on Terry Mac. I'm not one of them.I hope not, but, if you guys want, we can use him. What a 3 headed monster we would have