fredsdeadfriend
Well-Known Member
Well,-they have the best hockey program in the country (even though multiple schools have more titles)
they produce THE MOST NHLers,
they produce THE MOST points scored by former US college players in the NHL,
they produce THE MOST players making NHL All-Star status,
they produce THE MOST US Olympic Hockey players, and it's not even close, they produce TWICE AS MANY as the 3rd best team.,
they produce THE MOST US Olympic Hockey Medalists, and it's not even close,
they produce THE MOST US Olympic Hockey GOLD Medalists and its beyond even being close. UMn has won more Gold Medals than all other college hockey programs COMBINED, I believe. I could be wrong about this one, but I seriously doubt it,
they produce THE MOST US Hockey Hall of Famers. At one time, it was fully 1/3rd of the US Hockey Hall of Fame was made up of former Golden Gophers,
they produce THE MOST Hockey Hall of Famers, too.
They were the first college team invited to represent the US at the Olympics, one of their players was the first to win the Hobey Baker Award. A Gopher player was also considered when naming that Award. As a consolation, they modeled the Award after a Gopher player. UMn won the first intercollegiate Hockey game played. UMn won a ton of Natl Titles(finished seasons ranked #1 in the polls, like cfb did before and after hockey did it), in the 20s and a couple in the 30s as well, with a perfect season in 1940(not common in college hockey).
Michigan and Denver and probably UND as well, which made more sense as they were not far from the Canadian border, but it was mostly Michigan and Denver, responded by going north of the border and recruiting older Canadiens playing in the Minor Leagues to fill up their rosters. All 3 schools won several titles during this time but stopped doing it when most other schools, led by Minnesota, refused to play them.
Had Minnesota not led this effort, the US Olympic Hockey program may never have won a single Gold Medal, much less two, and might not have won any of the many Silver Medals it's won as well?
And Michigan and Denver? After they quit loading up on older Canadians, they stopped winning Natl Titles, go figure. UND figured out just to recruit the state of Minnesota hard and even resorted to hiring a former Gopher as their coach and they kept on winning Titles. Half of Wisconsin's titles were won with a former Gopher as their coach as well, and when they didn't have a former Gopher coaching them, they found a native Minnesotan who knew well enough to recruit mostly Minnesotans. Their 1983 title team had more Minnesotans than any other source, next was Canadians/foreigners, and a couple from Wisconsin, lol.
Minnesota may have also hurt their own chances to win Natl Titles in the 80s and 90s as well as they went from recruiting mostly Minnesotans and almost no Canadians, to recruiting only 100% Minnesotan. This helped both Minnesota hockey, and I mean Minnesota as a state, and US hockey in general as there were far too many top recruits growing up in Minnesota for the Gophers to be able to take care of them all, so other Minnesota based hockey schools started moving up to Div 1, and schools all over the country looked to the State of Minnesota to fill out their rosters.
I'm fine when people TRY to claim this school or that school has a better hockey program than Minnesota because they've won more Natl Titles, but I'll disagree with them always and argue my case just as I have here. But it's the height of hypocrisy to prop up as legitimate a ranking/rating system that ranks a program #1 despite another program having THREE TIMES as many Titles, and then turning around and criticizing me for claiming UMn's #1 in hockey, with your only reason given for being critical being UMn's not having the most Natl Titles?!
You sir, need help.