yeodonie
Small Member
Last edited by a moderator:
Can I go to Joe's Pizzaria? I could go for a mess of pizza on the house.
Okay - I know what you mean, but I disagree. There is a difference between students and faculty/coaches/administrators. But I am uncomfortable with a definition of "School" that excludes the students as part of the definition. Thus, if students are taking stuff, then the school is involved because the students are part of the school.
I'm not naive enough to believe that these $100 handshakes are happening everywhere. In fact, SB Nation published a very interesting story on the subject over the summer entitles "Mee the Bagman". And perhaps I am too polyanna-ish in my wish that the practice would stop. But I also believe that this is exactly the kind of action that makes athletes feel that they are not answerable to rules (or laws) and thus enables some really bad behavior.
Agreed. To me what is telling about a program is twofold: how much effort they put into prevention, and how they respond when a problem is exposed. But as you say, placing responsibility for the health of a program into the hands of kids who may or may not feel any responsibility - or for that matter even know what that word means - means that there will be problems.However, the fact is, it's impossible to stop.
Similar situation faced by USC when Matt Leinart's father paid for Matt's apartment, which he shared with another player who was staying rent-free. In my opinion, that was treated as it should have been - identified and corrected.Part of the problem, imo, is some of the rules themselves.
Agreed. To me what is telling about a program is twofold: how much effort they put into prevention, and how they respond when a problem is exposed. But as you say, placing responsibility for the health of a program into the hands of kids who may or may not feel any responsibility - or for that matter even know what that word means - means that there will be problems.
Similar situation faced by USC when Matt Leinart's father paid for Matt's apartment, which he shared with another player who was staying rent-free. In my opinion, that was treated as it should have been - identified and corrected.
But enough of the Kumbaya "we agree" fest.
My feeling on what inspired this thread remains unchanged. Oregon can not afford to ignore the allegations of Lyerla, label him as a malcontent and hope it all blows over. They have too much at stake to not take a serious look. They need to not merely look with the intent of minimizing the damage either - they have to actually look and deal with it. I figure that irrespective of the veracity of the accusations, the booster will be identified and ostracized, albeit perhaps not publicly. If not, we'll be hearing about this sort of thing again soon - either because kids are being offered things they shouldn't be, or because kid believe they can have their "Jerry Springer" moment by falsely pointing a finger.
Just wow.
Trying to get drug money for interview. Talking to the columnist/radio host Canzano high as he was arrested shortly after requesting 1st $5,000, then saying now it will cost $10k but will settle for $7,500.
Sheesh Colt is a ticking time bomb.
Canzano: Colt Lyerla story turns sad; hours before arrest, he tried to cut a deal for an interview | OregonLive.com