ericd7633
Well-Known Member
Yes, and the article said he was dealing with back pain since October
Yes, and the article said he was dealing with back pain since October
I definitely believe he is fucking with you.
I sometimes throw some salt & pepper into it & stir it with a stick & viola Fools Stew is made.
Now I also believe he believes he got sat because Foles was going to do better. I also think he thinks Wentz could have continued playing if they felt he was needed or if he would have helped the Playoff situation.
Your fellow Eagle fan (eric something) tried to point this out to you.
I am impressed Manster kept you going for this many pages honestly
Then again. It all could have just been fake! (since he was getting benched for Foles anyways)
YouYes, it was from December and it says his back was hurting all season. What’s your point?
You said they reported the back, back in October. Where's those October reports?Yes, and the article said he was dealing with back pain since October
What’s the face palm about Eric? I can show several articles showing he reported back pain since October. Honestly don’t get your facepalm?
Well Eagles Doctors do have beady little eyes & therefore cannot be trusted.Here’s my only issue with your one point. You said Manster was being over the top because I was being over the top and that sounds plausible BUT he was saying Wentz was NEVER hurt before I even said the word “surgery”. But thanks for letting me know I was being ridiculous for saying surgery and that Manster is being ridiculous saying Wentz was never hurt and the broken vertebrae was all a lie concocted by the Eagles, Wentz and their Drs
What’s the face palm about Eric? I can show several articles showing he reported back pain since October. Honestly don’t get your facepalm?
Well Eagles Doctors do have beady little eyes & therefore cannot be trusted.
So I agree they were lying about something.
he went from not on an injury report to benched for an injury that didnt just happen the week before. Something was covered up.
that would be another plausible argumentI'm more in line that the Eagles med staff don't know what the hell they're doing.
that would be another plausible argument
they never got fined.......... so maybe
The Eagles were blatantly breaking the rules regarding injured players. I'm surprised they haven't been punished for this.
Well the one you provided did not, just an FYI. I read the article 3 times and didn't see the word October once.
Too late now but yes he should have been on the injury list dating back to October