K.J.Ester
New Member
If any of those three players are there and they choose not to take him, then you would have the right to see it as a failure. If those three are gone and they never have a chance to get them? I cant call that a failure. At least I wouldnt blame the Lions for it.
People keep saying you dont draft a guard at #5. Why? Because that is the way it always has been? The rules of drafting are different now with a rookies contracts cut down now. In the past, teams didnt draft them because they were not worth the money you would have to give them for being drafted so early. Now that is not the case. Now you draft the best player for the team, no matter the position, because you will not be over spending for him.
IFor what they have to pay the first rounders these days, I think I would rather the lions draft Warmack over a LT. He is the best Guard in the draft, and fits a bigger need IMO because the Lions dont need a LT with Reiff taking the spot this year.
Yet none of this matters to me because I want them to take Milliner over any of them.
People keep saying you dont draft a guard at #5. Why? Because that is the way it always has been? The rules of drafting are different now with a rookies contracts cut down now. In the past, teams didnt draft them because they were not worth the money you would have to give them for being drafted so early. Now that is not the case. Now you draft the best player for the team, no matter the position, because you will not be over spending for him.
IFor what they have to pay the first rounders these days, I think I would rather the lions draft Warmack over a LT. He is the best Guard in the draft, and fits a bigger need IMO because the Lions dont need a LT with Reiff taking the spot this year.
Yet none of this matters to me because I want them to take Milliner over any of them.