shopson67
Well-Known Member
I like Tolliver, but you're talking about other options in place of who the Lakers did sign. They didn't sign a combo forward, and to do so in place of Rondo/Lance/McGee wouldn't make sense. Otherwise, Tolliver would've been a good choice, I agree. More of an additional move than in place of one of those three though.
Any vets signed this year that aren't max contract superstar types are support players behind the young core (with the exception of KCP, who will start over Hart for now). Ball, Ingram, and Kuzma were going to get big minutes regardless of any acquisitions (other than trades that could move them off the roster). They went for offense in the draft, and defense in free agency for a balanced total approach.
Whether or not those other options you mentioned were willing to sign one year deals with the Lakers to potentially be backups to the young core can't really be known without being on the inside, but I'm going to guess that at least some of them weren't looking for that kind of role.
Any vets signed this year that aren't max contract superstar types are support players behind the young core (with the exception of KCP, who will start over Hart for now). Ball, Ingram, and Kuzma were going to get big minutes regardless of any acquisitions (other than trades that could move them off the roster). They went for offense in the draft, and defense in free agency for a balanced total approach.
Whether or not those other options you mentioned were willing to sign one year deals with the Lakers to potentially be backups to the young core can't really be known without being on the inside, but I'm going to guess that at least some of them weren't looking for that kind of role.