Yes 100% Brady is better then Kap but We have a much better RB and WRs then Brady has ever had. Imagine Brady with gore like running back and WRs like Boldin and Crabtree and throw in VD. Damn know one would beat them. I know they have Gronk but they haven't won anything since he has been there.
Ohh you mean when he had Moss breaking the Wr record? Or Wes Welker? Or Gronk? He has had weapons.
Brady had better support than that with Moss & Welker. But you're proving my point; Kap has a great OL, a great TE and above-average WRs. And he's still nowhere near as good as Brady.
You don't need to be a great HC to get great QB play out of one of the best QBs to ever play the game (see Peyton). But to get the season-&-a-half out of Alex Smith that Harbaugh did you need to be a magician.
Again they didn't win a Super Bowl. Im talking bout when they were winning.
Got ya. He had a defense and a kicker for those
Im confused: I think Brady is 100% better then Smith and Kap but Kap and Smith has had better talent around them. They have had better supporting cast. Im talking 49ers now and Pats when they were winning it all.
Jim doesn't have Tom Brady. He had Alex freeking Smith & still got a play or 2 away from the SB.
And Kap isn't exactly a shoe-in for the HOF either.
Well coaches are graded on wins most of the time so here are the top 5 teams with the most wins since 2011.
1) New England 39
2) SF 38
3) Baltimore 35
4) Denver 34
5) Green Bay 34
You have to give Harbaugh credit. He's the only one on that list who has done it without a quarterback.
You have to give Harbaugh credit. He's the only one on that list who has done it without a quarterback.
Agreed. Flacco sucks.
I disagree. We have Kap and Smith. Also Denver did that with Tebow.
If only that were true. We'd be six-time Super Bowl Champs now.
You might be right. He was slangin' ducks and throwing up prayers. His luckboxiness might have transcended whatever team he played on that day.
Doesn't mean he's not a steaming pile of poo when it comes to the QB position.