It Needs To Be Said

[nebearsfan70]

Nah. Thread is about Aaron Rodgers and predictably turned into a "but..but....my Tawmmmmy Brady" thread. Nice try with this attempt to deflect and make it about Seattle like every other god damn thread you post in though.

And just so we're clear both guys are super gay. Like real gay. But only one was gay enough to leave his first baby mama when he found out she was pregnant because he didn't think their son would be hot enough to make out with.

Ooohhhh.....

 

[Godstree]

Wow, racist much?

Yeah, not sure how I wanted to respond to that one.

 

[packerzrule]

c'mon... Good teams? The Packers are hardly a good team w/o Rodgers. GB is AR, then a bunch of mediocre players.

But they are a good team with him.......no?

 

[Rex Racer]

I know I'll never convince Patriots fans that Rodgers is better than Brady.

Because he isn't.

 

[Ricky Roma]

Best QB in the NFL.

 

[Rex Racer]

Ill never get that 37 seconds back

Good.

 

[Rex Racer]

Best QB in the NFL.

 

[The Derski]

Deep down Rexy knows. That’s why he flocks to every Rodgers thread to post Brady pictures.

 

[Thruthefog]

So how's the gimp holding up? I hear he's questionable this week.

 

[sonnyblack65]

So how's the gimp holding up? I hear he's questionable this week.

What's wrong with you, not nice to call brittle people gimps

 

[Rex Racer]

Deep down Rexy knows. That’s why he flocks to every Rodgers thread to post Brady pictures.

derp



I'll take a winner over a brittle stat queen every time. Busting balls on the uber-defensive
Packers' fans is just icing on the cake.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

What's the o/u on how long A-Rodg limps this week?

1. Until Pre-game warm ups are over?
2. Walking out to the coin toss?
3. Walking back from the coin toss?
4. First play he needs to escape the pocket?
5. Once the Pack is losing and need another "miraculous" come back?

Double up with this parlay if you want?

Does he limp after the game?
1. If GB wins?
2. If GB loses?

 

[tomcat1]

Folks, Let's be honest, there is no way to compare Brady vs. Rodgers with an equal supporting cast of offensive players.

For the most part Brady has been protected by a good offensive line and Rodgers has not had this luxury. We will never know what Rodgers stats might be if he had been the PATS QB during the Brady years. We will never know what Brady's stats might be if he had been the Packers QB during this same period of time so we are debating nonsense here. All I can say is that I have seen both of these QBs make many fabulous plays.

 

[jerseyhawksfan79]

But they are a good team with him.......no?

Always in the SB covo. Without AR, probably top 10 in the draft.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Nah. Thread is about Aaron Rodgers and predictably turned into a "but..but....my Tawmmmmy Brady" thread. Nice try with this attempt to deflect and make it about Seattle like every other god damn thread you post in though.

And just so we're clear both guys are super gay. Like real gay. But only one was gay enough to leave his first baby mama when he found out she was pregnant because he didn't think their son would be hot enough to make out with.

Sounds like you're talking from experience? To each their own.

 

[NWPATSFAN]

Nah. Thread is about Aaron Rodgers and predictably turned into a "but..but....my Tawmmmmy Brady" thread. Nice try with this attempt to deflect and make it about Seattle like every other god damn thread you post in though.

And just so we're clear both guys are super gay. Like real gay. But only one was gay enough to leave his first baby mama when he found out she was pregnant because he didn't think their son would be hot enough to make out with.

OBTW dipstick it was one of your 12s that first brought Brady into this thread.

 

[Rockinkuwait]

Folks, Let's be honest, there is no way to compare Brady vs. Rodgers with an equal supporting cast of offensive players.

For the most part Brady has been protected by a good offensive line and Rodgers has not had this luxury. We will never know what Rodgers stats might be if he had been the PATS QB during the Brady years. We will never know what Brady's stats might be if he had been the Packers QB during this same period of time so we are debating nonsense here. All I can say is that I have seen both of these QBs make many fabulous plays.

Offensive line pass protection looks a LOT different depending on the QB here.

Take Pats in 07-09. Same starters on that line. Light, Koppen, Mankins, Neal, Kaczur.

07 Brady 21 sacks to 578 pass attempts
08 Cassel 47 sacks to 516 pass attempts
09 Brady 16 sacks to 565 pass attempts

Same a couple years ago when Brady was suspended for 4 games
Pats w/o Brady gave up 9 sacks in 4 games without Brady, and 15 in the 12 games with him.

QB's not trying to extend plays make it easier on their lines (only block a spot 5 yards behind center for 3 seconds) than ones looking to evade the rush and extend the play. Its a risk that comes with the reward of more athletic QB's.

Both are elite QB's though.

Belichick is still looking to get up to .500 as a Patriot coach without Brady.

Belichick overall is 47-52 with 1 playoff appearance in 6 years without Brady as his starter.

Sure, having Brady allowed Belichick the consistency to prove his system works. But Rex Ryan is a better winning coach without Brady than Belichick without Brady.

 

[Montalban]

Aaron Rodgers is the most important person on any team in the NFL. The Packers, as a whole, are a shell of themselves when he's not healthy. He has the most impact on his team out of any other player in the league. It's a team sport, but Aaron Rodgers can change the landscape of the Packers just by being healthy or injured. No other team has a player that they can say that about. It was proven last night.

Brady is just as, if not more, important to his team

 

[Moab]

c'mon... Good teams? The Packers are hardly a good team w/o Rodgers. GB is AR, then a bunch of mediocre players.

Explain to us how that "bunch of mediocre players" beat the Bears last year with Brett Hundley at QB. I got time...

 

[Montalban]

Yes. They played conservative on both sides of the ball, after playing very aggressive in the first half. Like I already stated, they coached not to lose instead of, to win.

No. It was the two asshole holdouts on their defense who were out of shape and could not perform in the 2nd half.