whysies
New Member
Whitner's best year in SF was easily 2011. In 2012 & 2013 his coverage was crap.
And if Brown has been so steady, why did he just sign for backup money in a 1-year deal? And you can't say it's his age because it was a 1-year deal. 1 year older than 2013 isn't going to be the difference between a good starter (2011) and a borderline starter / backup caliber guy (2013 / 2014).
And Rogers??? He was one of the best CBs in the NFL in 2011. He was a liability in 2013.
I can't possibly see how someone could argue the play of the secondary didn't decline sharply from 2011 to 2013. That's mind boggling to me.
My B broham, thought you were talking about a decline from 2012 to 2013, not a decline from 2011 to 2013
I will stand by what I said though regarding Whitner and Brown (not Rogers, 2011 was by far his best year, the bum). I think this past year was Whitner's best (particularly in coverage- not that that's necessarily saying much). And Brown was the same old steady, mediocre Brown all 3 of those years.
I think Rogers declined from 2011 to 2013 (heavy pockets tend to slow down DBs) but definitely not Brown or Whitner. They were the same replaceable cogs that they always were.