MiamiVice
Well Liked Member
What should I look at that would suggest this? I'm having trouble finding even a single offensive statistic where he places that badly. Total hits is one I guess (he's 164th) but one can argue that batting average measures the same skill better and he's ranked 95th in that. He ranks 95th, 20th and 69th all-time in the basic triple slash categories, and there are somehow 150 hitters that were better? I get the general sense of what you're trying to say here, but you're exaggerating the point quite a bit.
My point is there are way better hitters than him... And he shouldn't even be in the discussion. Using stats alone doesn't always work... Because sometimes guys like Pete Rose can extend there career long enough to have better over all numbers totals. You can't say a guy like Rose is a better hitter than a guy like Gwynn because he has more hits... He just played more games and had more at bats... Career BA is different... If you play 22 yrs like cobb did and still have a .366 career BA... Thats insane. Also back to stat totals... Guys like Pujols and Miggy are way better hitters than martinez was... But they are still playing and dont have a finished statline.
Like i said... Cobb, Williams, and Ruth are debateable as the greatest ever... Nobody else really has a claim over those three... And Miggy would have to put up 7-10 more .330+ ba seasons with 35+ hr and 100+ rbi to be in the discussion.