megalodon30
Archduke of Crosstown Busses
Winning and losing is a team stat. I know qb's get all the credit and all the blame, but unless you think Manning is still a good qb because he went 10-2 as a starter this year, then you can't use the 9-7 qb record for Tebow to prove he was any good.
And as I said before, Tebow was trending down. His stats were getting worse and the Broncos lost 4 of his final 5 starts.
You're right that the win over the Steelers was great, but Tebow's play wasn't great that day. He still completed fewer than half of his passes, and most of his completions were to DT who was running wide open. In fact, the play that beat the Steelers in overtime was mostly DT: any qb in the NFL could have made that throw against that coverage. DT turned it into a touchdown because he had a great stiff arm and then breakaway speed.
As for Tebow being quasi-blackballed, I don't buy it for a second. The fact that he couldn't catch on with the Patriots basically disproves that theory. As entrenched as Tom Brady is, Tebow could have been the backup to groom with zero pressure on the coach to ever put him in. Instead, Belichick decided to not waste a roster spot on him. That should tell you all you need to know.
Yes winning and losing is a team stat. But a great QB makes winning easier. That's why I remarked earlier on Orton being 6-21 in his final 27 games in Denver. It shows how bad the team was and how much Tebow made it better.
And Tebow had a great game against PIT. Over 300 yards and 3 TDs. More than Manning did in the Super Bowl. Completion % isn't everything.
As for his time in New England, for the third time, I admit he was awful. However, he showed enough improvement imo with the Eagles to take a shot, but he didn't get it. And I don't believe it's because he's not talented, because he is. I believe it's because they didn't want the circus.