- Thread starter
- #1
kramer1
Sports betting savant
Hey, Mike....we wouldn't have even made the playoffs if not for instant replay. Remember the Tampa game??
Q: Will you vote for any of the proposed rule changes this week, particularly with so many about expansion of replay?
MB: I will likely vote against the expansion of instant replay, whatever its form. Every team who felt an injustice last year — shouldn't say every team, too many teams who felt injustice — reached out with a proposal to correct it in hindsight through instant replay going forward. Spare me. We all have those cases. It's remarkable to me that we have as many stoppages in the game as we do. I don't want more of that. I want less of that. Instant replay is one of those. They have gotten more efficient with it. That's good. Still, it's a couple minutes plus every time it kicks in. I am willing to accept the calls on the field. Sometimes are better than others. It's part of the game.
Q: Will you vote for any of the proposed rule changes this week, particularly with so many about expansion of replay?
MB: I will likely vote against the expansion of instant replay, whatever its form. Every team who felt an injustice last year — shouldn't say every team, too many teams who felt injustice — reached out with a proposal to correct it in hindsight through instant replay going forward. Spare me. We all have those cases. It's remarkable to me that we have as many stoppages in the game as we do. I don't want more of that. I want less of that. Instant replay is one of those. They have gotten more efficient with it. That's good. Still, it's a couple minutes plus every time it kicks in. I am willing to accept the calls on the field. Sometimes are better than others. It's part of the game.