poprocksncoke
Well-Known Member
better?You realize that is like the worst camera angle you could have picked right? That really shows nothing. It shows he was close but that is about it.
better?You realize that is like the worst camera angle you could have picked right? That really shows nothing. It shows he was close but that is about it.
We should definitely slow down the pace of play. I think it is a little too fast as it is.
better?
Agreed, it happens every week and to every team eventually. Except maybe the Patriots.Yeah that is a good angle. The officials never had that one in the game though because the NFL does not have cameras going down the sidelines for some reason. The call on the field was that he was in and because no camera angle could really dispute that they had to go with what they called.
In the Texans/Raiders game yeah it was close. I think he was more in than the picture above of the Bronco player and I think the official blew his whistle a little too quickly making it impossible to review for the Texans. I'm not saying they would have overturned it but that was a critical call in the game for both teams.
Agreed, it happens every week and to every team eventually. Except maybe the Patriots.
agree...I hear folks saying they need to be full time employees, why? So they can class room study 5 days each week? Accountability and more candidates in the pool seems more logical.Not an easy job
Im actually shocked at how good these guys are sometimes, when they make a call correctly in real time that we need 40 TV replays to determine
To minimize the inconsistency of application seems like an obvious answer. Some of that is the rules themselves but these refs aren't on the same page often times on things like PI. Not good for the league when you're scouting refs.agree...I hear folks saying they need to be full time employees, why? So they can class room study 5 days each week?
I don't see it other than more time deciphering rules and more discussion time about those rules.To minimize the inconsistency of application seems like an obvious answer. Some of that is the rules themselves but these refs aren't on the same page often times on things like PI. Not good for the league when you're scouting refs.
Yes the whole situation was screwed up.No replay allowed as they called the play dead supposedly.
I get it, fans will always complain. I'm not sure full time refs are the answer, will looking at film all week really make them better? Still the PR alone may be worth it for the league.
But it's clearly getting worse and the lack of accountability should be looked at. When even a casual fan cringes when they learn Jeff Triplett is working their team's game something is terribly wrong. There was no excuse for last night.
Im not saying the officials got the call right. But the hopkins play was a lot closer than i initially thought. When a player goes out of bounds they do blow the play dead. Which doesn't just effect the replay but the defensive players as well. When the whistle blew the raiders reacted by as the play was dead. Theres no guarantee Hopkins scores without the whistle. And if replay was allowed in the situation. There wouldn't have been enough to overturn the call anyway.Yes the whole situation was screwed up.
If they could review it. I don't think they would have had enough to over turn it. It was close and while the raiders secondary was awful. The whistle did change their pursuit. They could have continued to pursue. But tackling a player after a whistle is a personal foul. Very grey area.That Video shows he was gone. Bad job the refs. Cleared it more for me. Clear he was in.
I agree with Sherman too much isn't always a good thingI say Richard Sherman is right. Condense the rule book that requires a law degree to understand.
Call only the stuff that is obvious, not marginal.
Player safety above all else.
If one more official is needed on the field, do it.