- Thread starter
- #441
outofyourmind
Oklahoma Sooners
Probably better than Texas? Our 9 conference titles to your 4 pretty much seals that up.
That would be 3 for Texas.
Carry On.
Probably better than Texas? Our 9 conference titles to your 4 pretty much seals that up.
If we make good on one of those missed opportunities at the title we're probably having a different conversation, but we didn't and I'd tend to agree that Oklahoma has underperformed. That said, they have finished top 10 a total of 10 times since the formation of the big 12.
I don't know. Maybe my expectations are just too high for both schools. I'm just frustrated as hell. I have the utmost respect for the OU football program. What a great rivalry we have had. Losing the ATM rivalry was tough, but if we lost this one, I think I would just go home and shoot myself. I wish OU success in every game except one. A strong OU makes Texas better and vice versa in my opinion.
I'm not slamming OU and saying Texas is better. Far from it. Texas just flat ass sucks, and has for a long time now. I'm saying OU has undelivered as well. Has Texas been worse, probably, but there is no excuse for either school.
Everything you say maybe true, I really don't follow OU football that closely, but your comment about OU's play outside the conference is one of my points. When you look at it overall, the Big 12 really hasn't been that strong. Could that be the reason, I don't know, but it's possible. I don't think the Big 12 has been weak, but some of our success has come from playing in a weaker conference. Certainly up to 2010.
I agree. The good Texas and OU teams of the past would have had zero problems with the recent TCU and Baylor teams.Except for we have all been playing in the big 12. Not that impressive for either. The big 12 really didn't have some other schools that could compete consistently until the last 5 or 6 years in my opinion. We added TCU. Good program, but starting to come down to reality. Baylor has been successful, but it hasn't been the same way a Texas or an OU does it. They went after kids that were great football players, that Texas and OU wouldn't touch. Academics, off the field issues were huge concerns to programs that care about ethics. Baylor did not. They got these kids through school with a weak academic program, and obviously tried to hide the illegal activities. They wanted a successful program to get the money. Obviously, they didn't care how they got there or the kids.
Winning conference championships is nice. But what happened at Oklahoma was Stoops was allowed to keep falling back on his winning conference championships as being enough to keep getting warm fuzzies and being paid top dollar. There ceased to be an attitude at Oklahoma that winning conference championships was not the big deal Stoops kept making it out to be; occasionally winning a NC when you have a real shot to win one is what the fans, the President and the AD demand at Oklahoma. Bob Stoops was allowed to get a little too comfortable, things started to slip and eventually we have gotten to where we are now. It was a long slide and the majority of OU fans don't see him climbing back up to the top of the mountain again.
I agree. Since 08 we just can't get it together. It's like the Nebraska Solich decision. Do you keep the 9-10 win season or roll the dice and really make some bad hires.
I think the really tangible evidence of that is in looking at our recruiting rankings since 2010 or so. We've been hovering around 16 or so when the data bears out pretty strongly that you need at least one top 10 class and more likely two on your roster to win a title. Bob got lazy and figured the name on the jersey was enough. Looking at what he's doing with recruiting right now he seems to be trying to get back on the horse, but is it too late? All I know is that he better hold that 2017 class together.
Totally agree. Recruiting is everything. I think we tend to put too blame on the coaches. You have to have the talent. The exact same thing happened with Mack Brown. Plus, I honestly think it can be media hype as well, but at the end of the day, you have to have some top 3 recruiting classes to have a good chance at an NC. I'm not saying it can't be done with less, but the more mud you throw on the wall, the more will stick. This is becoming my biggest concern for Charlie Strong. He has got to be able to recruit top talent to have a chance to turn this around. It's not easy at this point, but it has to be done.
Give him more time.
Not me. Oklahoma is located next to one of the three biggest recruiting grounds and is a rival to that state's best school. If Oklahoma switched locals with the state of Kansas, what do you think Oklahoma would be in football?The best move for OU is to disembark this sinking ship of a conference.
Winning the Big 12 this year is like winning the special olympics.
It all pays the same, we'll win it, go to the playoff, and collect our check.Winning the Big 12 this year is like winning the special olympics.
Totally agree. Recruiting is everything. I think we tend to put too blame on the coaches. You have to have the talent. The exact same thing happened with Mack Brown. Plus, I honestly think it can be media hype as well, but at the end of the day, you have to have some top 3 recruiting classes to have a good chance at an NC. I'm not saying it can't be done with less, but the more mud you throw on the wall, the more will stick. This is becoming my biggest concern for Charlie Strong. He has got to be able to recruit top talent to have a chance to turn this around. It's not easy at this point, but it has to be done.