Is it possible that you post primarily for shock value?We have invested in the guys he wants and he hasnt developed anybody. Not one of our OL will sniff the probowl, okung still jumps offsides constantly, our best guys are average at best. 6 years in our OL should be a well oiled machine, its a disaster.
We have invested in the guys he wants and he hasnt developed anybody. Not one of our OL will sniff the probowl, okung still jumps offsides constantly, our best guys are average at best. 6 years in our OL should be a well oiled machine, its a disaster.
Why was Turbin a 'knuckle-head?' From what I remember he was the perfect backup. Did what was asked of him, didn't complain, and produced when called upon.
Seattle has the least amount of money invested at the position and nearly all of it is locked up in Okung. We traded away an all pro center as well for a TE that didn't know how to block. I actually feel sorry for Cable.
I'm not sure how much influence Cable has in the draft and I think a lot is fan speculation as to how much power he has in acquiring talent. If I am in the GM position, I would only allow someone limited power in controlling whether I can put the right guys on the field or not. I would require a veto on anything.Least amount invested only because none of the drafted OL were worth a second contract since Cable came on board and was given the power to rate OL in the draft.
View attachment 55969
Least amount invested only because none of the drafted OL were worth a second contract since Cable came on board and was given the power to rate OL in the draft.
View attachment 55969
I'm not sure how much influence Cable has in the draft and I think a lot is fan speculation as to how much power he has in acquiring talent. If I am in the GM position, I would only allow someone limited power in controlling whether I can put the right guys on the field or not. I would require a veto on anything.
You are correct in that really no one earned a pay raise.
It is not Cable fault (mentioned in an earlier post) that O'kung causes so many false starts. That is on the player. Period. I prefer that we dump Okung's ass at the end of the year but that is a tough call. He is an average LT who has not lived up to his draft status.
What have you done for me lately? The OL played way over their heads against SF. If they can play nearly as good against Pitt, then it's hats off to Cable and the OL. Folks that understand this game might agree that Seattle's OL this year would be in a tough spot and would take the year to see if they can achieve a slightly below average performance which would be astonishing.
Don't get me wrong, I think Cable does a decent job of coaching the players up, but the Seahawks need to draft better when picking OL.Cable this and Cable that, but the OL has improved quite a bit since the early going, no two ways about it. We have regained the top spot in total rushing yards per game, and we also now have an undrafted rookie with the highest ypc in the NFL.
Yes it's speculation on how much power has on drafting OL, but I also feel it's obvious. Given that he's the one working out the Ol prospects during the draft, he's the one talking to the press after the draft about the OL drafted etc.
As for dumping OKung, well given how badly the Seahawks have done drafting RT ( Carp, Britt and now Gilliam ) I sure don't like the idea of trying to find a decent LT. So even though Okung is brittle and draw flags at times, I rather the Seahawk keep him, until they have a proven replacement.
As for the play against a injury riddled 49er team, I felt the OL played just OK. Lets see how they do against the Steelers.
No disagreement with that Harold, but I wonder if the team is changing their plan when drafting OL as their prior plan did not work well at all.Don't get me wrong, I think Cable does a decent job of coaching the players up, but the Seahawks need to draft better when picking OL.
Is it possible that you post primarily for shock value?