GNT 2.20.13| Flyers @ Pens | Keystone State Deathmatch |7:30PM

[LeaderOCola]

does the video prove Neal was not high-stickedi n the face?

I bet I can find a clip with equal foul that was not called... therefore it's not a penalty!

 

[flyersfan4706]

your perception that I'm some novice n00b is insulting shit.

where did I ever say it doesnt happen? I argued that the call per the rules (which you all half-cite) is wrong.
the combination of camera angles shows concluisvely the puck was in.

you posted a video of less conclusiveness as some argument to justify the noncall.

Quit crying. Argue the call/noncall on its own merit. Do you think the 3 camera angles showed by VS(NBCS) do not prove crossing the line per the rules ? If so, fine, argue it. If not, you are saying the puck teleported out of the glove for a frame.

You clearly are some novice n00b based upon how you interpret this rule.

Just tell me before I argue how you're wrong, what did the angles show that the puck was 100% guaranteed to be totally over the line?

 

[evolver115]

Easy fellas. 2nd period is on the way. Just let it go.

 

[4thstreet]

way to hang in there Flyers.down 2,outshot 12-2 at one point and then boom,2 tallies and a dozen shots in a row for them.

let's get a few ,for a cushion in the 2nd.

as for the "non" goal-yesterday,it might have been a goal.tomorrow,it might be a goal,today-no goal.

 

[LeaderOCola]

You clearly are some novice n00b based upon how you interpret this rule.

Just tell me before I argue how you're wrong, what did the angles show that the puck was 100% guaranteed to be totally over the line?

you are clearly some internet posting n00b who can't even read posts I already made in this thread.


but fine, I agree with you. even though combo-camera angles showed

1) goalie glove pocket behind line (overhead)
2) puck in goalie glove pocket through shot 'catch') forward camera

it's impossible to conclude the puck crossed the goal line. it suddenly teleported out of glove between key frames.

 

[loki604]

I am so emotional after one period. Wait...what did I just say?

 

[evolver115]

I am so emotional after one period. Wait...what did I just say?

 

[LeaderOCola]

figured we'd see more hitting already here in the 2nd

 

[flyersfan4706]

you are clearly some internet posting n00b who can't even read posts I already made in this thread.


but fine, I agree with you. even though combo-camera angles showed

1) goalie glove pocket behind line (overhead)
2) puck in goalie glove pocket through shot 'catch') forward camera

it's impossible to conclude the puck crossed the goal line. it suddenly teleported out of glove between key frames.

I already said it is a bullshit rule in this thread, so clearly you lack reading comprehension as well.

The only angle that could possibly show it was in is the overhead, and Bryz's glove was in the way. You can't show it's in the net, therefore it isn't a goal. It is not hard to understand, or maybe it is.

 

[DevilishWon]

somebody hit someone.....come on

 

[esls79]

The Zapruder tape says if the glove doesn't fit, then you must rule no goal.

 

[LeaderOCola]

I already said it is a bullshit rule in this thread, so clearly you lack reading comprehension as well.

The only angle that could possibly show it was in is the overhead, and Bryz's glove was in the way. You can't show it's in the net, therefore it isn't a goal. It is not hard to understand, or maybe it is.

 

[flyersfan4706]

Wow

 

[evolver115]

Turkey's on the table

 

[LeaderOCola]

Couterier to the box

 

[DevilishWon]

If youre gonna take a crosschecking call you really should leave a deeper gouge

 

[dash]

The Zapruder tape says if the glove doesn't fit, then you must rule no goal.

I'm waiting for Marcia Clark and Chris Darden to weigh in...

 

[element1286]

Ugh, real time that looked like a bad call on Neal.

 

[flyersfan4706]

Hope Read is alright

 

[4thstreet]

totally confused on that pp