GNT 2.20.13| Flyers @ Pens | Keystone State Deathmatch |7:30PM

[element1286]

Hard to play D when your in the goal

Second goal everyone was standing around.

 

[LeaderOCola]

I didn't write the rule book, buddy. And no angle was conclusive, otherwise it would have counted

it's only inconclusive if you don't understand physics.

 

[beantownmaniac]

Who's this tough guy Cooke playing for Pitt these days? GREAT FIGHT

 

[Nasty_Magician]

This game is not disappointing.

 

[BadMotoWeazal]

We are watching a soon to be classic game!!!!

 

[evolver115]

Haha! That was great. Wayne and Tanner were smiling at the end of it

 

[LeaderOCola]

Haha! That was great. Wayne and Tanner were smiling at the end of it

+1

 

[DevilishWon]

any near fatal injuries?

 

[flyersfan4706]

it's only inconclusive if you don't understand physics.

You're right. Welcome to being a hockey fan.

 

[BOSSMANPC]

so imagine the same scenario, except the goalies entire arm is shot-momentum-pulled behind the line, and his glove is touching the back netting.

does the inability to see the puck form the overhead mean you can't conclude it's a goal ?

Yes, The rule CLEARLY says the off ice official must see the PUCK in the net. No matter how much sense that makes or not that is the rule.

 

[Dacks]

Vokoun has been fighting the puck this game....

 

[LeaderOCola]

Yes, The rule CLEARLY says the off ice official must see the PUCK in the net. No matter how much sense that makes or not that is the rule.

I'm aware. Does the rule say that it (sight) must be achieved in a single camera angle ?

 

[element1286]

I didn't write the rule book, buddy. And no angle was conclusive, otherwise it would have counted

Can't find the video, but I'm pretty sure Ryan Whitney's first career goal was that exact scenario, and they called it good. You couldn't see the puck over the line, but the glove was over the line.

 

[flyersfan4706]

Can't find the video, but I'm pretty sure Ryan Whitney's first career goal was that exact scenario, and they called it good. You couldn't see the puck over the line, but the glove was over the line.

It is a bullshit rule, I've been on your end plenty of times. It is a rule though, and there's nothing to be disputed.

 

[BOSSMANPC]

I'm aware. Does the rule say that it (sight) must be achieved in a single camera angle ?

It must be seen in the net. If it's one camera, two or three they must see the puck in the net.

 

[Jimmy_the_Tongue]

Vokoun has been fighting the puck this game....

I see that too...not to confident in him right now.

 

[LeaderOCola]

It must be seen in the net. If it's one camera, two or three they must see the puck in the net.

so

1) front angle shows puck in goalie glove mesh netting entirety of catch

2) overhead angle and in-net angle show entirety of netting passes behind goalline and post due to shot momentum

3) connect dots ?

4) "seen in the net" are you sure you want to argue that? tons of goals reviewed and scored that never touched ANY net.

 

[BadMotoWeazal]

Second goal everyone was standing around.

Looked like most were just "sitting" around. Almost looked like Vokoun wanted to swap positions with Letang.

 

[BOSSMANPC]

Can't find the video, but I'm pretty sure Ryan Whitney's first career goal was that exact scenario, and they called it good. You couldn't see the puck over the line, but the glove was over the line.

Then that call was incorrect. TRUST ME, I've had this discussion many times and the rule says they must see the damn puck in the net. I'm not saying I totally agree but that is the way the rule is written.

 

[element1286]

It is a bullshit rule, I've been on your end plenty of times. It is a rule though, and there's nothing to be disputed.

Yea, it's a technicality to make it easier on refs.