GNT 2.20.13| Flyers @ Pens | Keystone State Deathmatch |7:30PM

[flyersfan4706]

 

[LeaderOCola]

and Letang takes an idiotic crosscheck off to the box

 

[BOSSMANPC]

Fuck me I wish I had a dollar for every time I have won this damn debate.

 

[BadMotoWeazal]

Gonna be a fight to the locker room

 

[LeaderOCola]

neal takes stick to face ?

ubcalled?

 

[evolver115]

High stick, no call

 

[flyersfan4706]

Woah, did Malkin just tomahawk Staal?

 

[BadMotoWeazal]

No home cooking for the Pens?

 

[evolver115]

Woah, did Malkin just tomahawk Staal?

No Staal's left

 

[LeaderOCola]

are you trying to argue there's 3 equivalent camera angles on this play to the "non goal" in this game? because.... I'm not seeing them.

 

[flyersfan4706]

No Staal's left

I'm not missing him

 

[flyersfan4706]

are you trying to argue there's 3 equivalent camera angles on this play to the "non goal" in this game? because.... I'm not seeing them.

I'm showing that the Malkin non-goal isn't an anomaly. It has happened to my Flyers, against the Penguins.

 

[evolver115]

I'm not missing him

You might not be so happy when Shero moves his surplus of blue liners for a top six winger, though

That move netted them Pouliot and Dumolin

 

[LeaderOCola]

I'm showing that the Malkin non-goal isn't an anomaly. It has happened to my Flyers, against the Penguins.

It is an anomoly to have 3 conclusive angles (to high school educated people in physics) to have an obvious goal disallowed

 

[BadMotoWeazal]

The thing about hockey is, we all as fans look for perfection in an imperfect environment.

 

[flyersfan4706]

It is an anomoly to have 3 conclusive angles (to high school educated people in physics) to have an obvious goal disallowed

To the NHL rulebook, "conclusive" is being able to see the puck across the goal line. End of discussion.

Tough fucking luck they don't use physics. It has happened TO ALL OF US. You'll get used to it as you start watching games.

 

[flyersfan4706]

You might not be so happy when Shero moves his surplus of blue liners for a top six winger, though

That move netted them Pouliot and Dumolin

Oh I fear that. I can't trust Shero.

 

[evolver115]

Oh I fear that. I can't trust Shero.

I don't know what he is up to. Today, at morning skate, they had free agent Mark Eaton there, and Despres has been a healthy scratch for two games, now...

 

[LeaderOCola]

To the NHL rulebook, "conclusive" is being able to see the puck across the goal line. End of discussion.

Tough fucking luck they don't use physics. It has happened TO ALL OF US. You'll get used to it as you start watching games.

your perception that I'm some novice n00b is insulting shit.

where did I ever say it doesnt happen? I argued that the call per the rules (which you all half-cite) is wrong.
the combination of camera angles shows concluisvely the puck was in.

you posted a video of less conclusiveness as some argument to justify the noncall.

Quit crying. Argue the call/noncall on its own merit. Do you think the 3 camera angles showed by VS(NBCS) do not prove crossing the line per the rules ? If so, fine, argue it. If not, you are saying the puck teleported out of the glove for a frame.

 

[flyersfan4706]

I don't know what he is up to. Today, at morning skate, they had free agent Mark Eaton there, and Despres has been a healthy scratch for two games, now...

He was at a Wild-Avs game last week.