So much potential material left over the GB II. That ugly love child Oscar...Rick Moranis and Annie Potts, Ackroyd, Winston, Murray?It looks dumb anyways. Even the trailer was slow moving.
Let's you and me make a pact to boycott that muthaIt looks dumb anyways. Even the trailer was slow moving.
All of them are listed in the cast credits (plus Sigourney Weaver) but the ugly baby and Moranis, who I’m pretty sure lives in a cave off the grid somewhere.So much potential material left over the GB II. That ugly love child Oscar...Rick Moranis and Annie Potts, Ackroyd, Winston, Murray?
Too much sugar coating in this review and you need to tell us exactly how you feel.Yes. It. Was.
It's unbelievable that they could have 4 VERY FUNNY WOMEN, and the movie be so completely devoid of humor. It was awful.
The only parts that even had the tiniest semblance of funny, was Hemsworth's character and the fucking delivery boy.
Again, very funny cast, that were all cast as the same person, and weirdly unfunny.
I never saw the 2016 one either but my understanding is that was a hard reboot and was never intended to be part of the same timeline as the originals. In fact I believe Bill Murray made a cameo but not as Peter Venkman.I have not read anything about this, so maybe the general story is already out there, but from that trailer…
It looks like the GBs from the 80s ended up having a storage issue with all the ghosts they caught, and Egon went to the middle of nowhere to bury the ectoplasm storage unit. Now, 30 years later, either his grandson “breaks the seal”, or somehow the container becomes compromised and all the ghosts they caught all those years earlier begin breaking out.
I never saw the “other” GB movie. I hope this one acts like it never happened, though, from everything I heard about it.