- Thread starter
- #21
BsGenius
Well-Known Member
Hi dumb dumb, how are you?
Whoa what's with the anger? Remember, there's only one genius here. Don't try to be me, be you. Understand gramps?
Hi dumb dumb, how are you?
Amos was something special as he was good every week like clockwork. It's why we could not afford to keep him. They have this breakdown with film on HaHa on a different board I post and HaHa is shockingly bad and out of position often. He takes bad angles and gives up big plays weekly the exact opposite of Amos. I thought more of HaHa myself until I watched the breakdown vids, now I wish we had a rookie to play. He was not just bad he was awful. I agree with we should have paid Calahan the lousy little bit more he wanted. Go to chicitysports board and check the haha breakdown, it will depress you how bad he plays.
Correction. They could afford to keep Amos but they didn't want to. Likely because they didn't feel Amos was worth what GB paid. Amos looked good in a great defense however singularly he wasn't that good.
There's breakdown videos of even Urlacher looking bad. No one is saying HaHa is a superstar but IMO, if the bar is Amos, HaHa is right there with him.
WTF I nor any Bear fan needed to see that again.
Whoa what's with the anger?
Remember, there's only one genius here.
Don't try to be me
Understand gramps?
WTF I nor any Bear fan needed to see that again.
No one is saying HaHa is a superstar but IMO, if the bar is Amos, HaHa is right there with him.