- Thread starter
- #1
Cobiemonster
Well-Known Member
http://t.co/m0y263J6Gf
Curious to see the $
BTW, how do we embed tweets, or is that something they're working on?
Last edited by a moderator:
ya, they're working on some of the embedding stuff still. Tweets are a pretty higher priority I believe.
I don't like the Schultz signing at all. He's been good this year, and great relative to expectations and contract. But he should have been traded for future pieces and the Flyers already have too many dmen.
Hopefully we get rid of some of the above at the deadline.the flyers now have
Coburn
Schenn
Schultz
Grossmann
MacDonald
Streit
All under contract for next season. Where do they plan on making improvements to that? I don't understand this signing at all. It's a good term and a good price, but it's not what the Flyers need. Having 6 bottom 4 dmen is pointless?
If Hextall can't move at least 2 of the above before July 1, they will be in the exact same position they are in today, next season. A decent, but top heavy, group of forwards, a good goalie, and a terrible defense.
Flyers fans on twitter are the absolute worst
What is the team supposed to do? Trade every d-man and just play all the young guys at once next season? Nick Schultz relative to the production of the rest of the defense, has the most affordable contract for the next two seasons and isn't going to kill the Flyers whatsoever, they have to keep a few veterans so that the young guys don't get overwhelmed when they come in next season
The Flyers were going to end up making trades on defense anyway - they're still going to have to deal two guys to begin with so Braydon Coburn will be gone imo and you'll get good assets for him and a guy like Nicklas Grossmann or even Kimmo might get moved and you'll get assets there, plus guys like Luke Schenn are expiring after next season - eventually those guys will be gone and then the young guys will be able to mature with a few veterans there
Can't make everyone happy I guess - would I have liked to see the Flyers get an asset or two for Nick Schultz? It would have been good most likely but I wouldn't have gotten so mad like every other fan where I'd quit watching the team over them signing a god damned sixth defenseman to a good contract for the next two seasons - it's embarrassing the way fans act on twitter and the melodramatic attitude they possess every time the Flyers make a move like this - if they are so mad about it, let me rip their fan card in their face and embarrass them so they can go root for a team like Edmonton or Carolina, that has been perennially garbage the last decade now
Schultz has played very well this year. He was a bargain at $1+ mill. The problem is that this 6 as a group isn't very good. There is zero room for improvement and it would be a luxury to have one off these guys as a number 7.
If Hexy can move one of Coburn, Schenn or Grossmann, cap space would open as would a spot for a younger DMan. I don't believe Streit will go and I don't think the best GM in Hockey could put a package together to get someone to take A Macs contract. I would also like to see MDZ back if he is not traded and the deal can be reasonable. Without a top 6 spot open, even if Morin, Ghost, Hagg, Sanheim or Manning had a great camp they would have trouble making the roster because none of those guys can be a number 7.
Hexy must have something in the works that he feels pretty sure with pan out. I will wait until we see how the rest of the season goes to make further comment. All I know is that if we have the same top 6 next year, we are majorly FUCKED!!!!!
Flyers fans on twitter are the absolute worst
What is the team supposed to do? Trade every d-man and just play all the young guys at once next season? Nick Schultz relative to the production of the rest of the defense, has the most affordable contract for the next two seasons and isn't going to kill the Flyers whatsoever, they have to keep a few veterans so that the young guys don't get overwhelmed when they come in next season
The Flyers were going to end up making trades on defense anyway - they're still going to have to deal two guys to begin with so Braydon Coburn will be gone imo and you'll get good assets for him and a guy like Nicklas Grossmann or even Kimmo might get moved and you'll get assets there, plus guys like Luke Schenn are expiring after next season - eventually those guys will be gone and then the young guys will be able to mature with a few veterans there
Can't make everyone happy I guess - would I have liked to see the Flyers get an asset or two for Nick Schultz? It would have been good most likely but I wouldn't have gotten so mad like every other fan where I'd quit watching the team over them signing a god damned sixth defenseman to a good contract for the next two seasons - it's embarrassing the way fans act on twitter and the melodramatic attitude they possess every time the Flyers make a move like this - if they are so mad about it, let me rip their fan card in their face and embarrass them so they can go root for a team like Edmonton or Carolina, that has been perennially garbage the last decade now
You make it sound like trades are easy to make. The problem is that someone has to actually want what the team has to offer. The trade deadline is big on over paying for rental players to add the missing piece. The problem is that none of our defensemen are actual rentals as the are over paid for at least 1 more if not more years.
For a team to take Coburn they have to have some decent cap space this year and be willing to pay him next year. By my estimate only 13 teams could afford him without moving cap space. Of those 13 teams 5 are not buyers. Nashville has made their move and will not be in the market for him. That leave 7 maybes including the Sharks, Wild, Panthers, Jets, Islanders, Ducks and Flames. I would be very surprised if the Wild, Panthers or Jets would be interested. That leaves 4 maybes. Not as big a market as you would think. For this reason I think the most attractive piece is Grossmann and he is one of the few 2nd pairing guys we have.
In 2 years the situation looks better, but as we sit here today it looks like we will have the same defense next year. Playoffs? Maybe? Long run? NFW with this group.
Um, wat? That is my whole point? You can't trade everyone because you need guys who can actually play next season, and it's not possible to trade everyone - the Flyers can't trade everyone for a bunch of different reasons
I think you misunderstood my whole point
The Flyers were going to end up making trades on defense anyway - they're still going to have to deal two guys to begin with so Braydon Coburn will be gone imo and you'll get good assets for him and a guy like Nicklas Grossmann or even Kimmo might get moved and you'll get assets there, plus guys like Luke Schenn are expiring after next season - eventually those guys will be gone and then the young guys will be able to mature with a few veterans there
This is what I was addressing, I bolded the wrong section. Sorry about that. I don't think Coburn, Grossman or Timonen are definitely moving. It looks like Kimmo may play 2 games before March 2. I he plays well and we are still in that 4-7 points from the post season, he may just stay. For the Shultz signing to make sense we really need to move at least 2 of Coburn, Grossmann and Schenn. It really may be harder then some think.
I thought he would have been one of those dealt by the TD.. I don't understand this?ya, they're working on some of the embedding stuff still. Tweets are a pretty higher priority I believe.
I don't like the Schultz signing at all. He's been good this year, and great relative to expectations and contract. But he should have been traded for future pieces and the Flyers already have too many dmen.
I would also like to see MDZ back if he is not traded and the deal can be reasonable.