Profootballtalk's Mike Florio reports Jimmy Garoppolo can be released without penalty by the Raiders this summer because of his 2022 foot injury.
Garoppolo's deal originally included an $11.25 million signing bonus, but that was converted to part of his base salary after he failed his Raiders physical this spring. Garoppolo can be cut for "any reason" related to his foot, but his $22.5 million salary becomes guaranteed once he "passes a physical exam, is active for at least one regular-season game, and does not suffer re-injury to his left foot." It would certainly seem Garoppolo's physical was most disturbing to the Silver and Black. What was already looking like a questionable signing now has the makings of a potential fiasco.
Sounds like it's just paperwork'Since it happens in other major sports leagues, fans of the National Football League may wonder whether or not an NFL player could own a team in the league.
No, NFL players cannot own a team because the league’s constitution forbids owners from playing on the field.
So, an NFL player having interest in becoming an owner or co-owner would first have to retire.'
or in Brady's case, sell his minority interest.
Not that that couldn't happen, but he would have to get out of the owners box before un-retiring, and taking snaps in Vegas
This is a rational, lucid argument. And most likely spot on.I have a hard time believing he's giving up more part ownership in a team and more money from Fox than he made in his entire career to come back to a team that has no hope of winning a Super Bowl this year (sorry Treff).
Well like Joe mentioned, Brady may very well think he's the piece that can turn this team from no hope to hopeful.I have a hard time believing he's giving up more part ownership in a team and more money from Fox than he made in his entire career to come back to a team that has no hope of winning a Super Bowl this year (sorry Treff).
That's probably what they should do, but some ownership has a really hard time hitting that reset button completely. Look at the Bucs this year. They should have completely blown their roster up once Brady retired, but they didn't do anything. I think a lot of it is more of an old school mentality because owners think that if they completely blow the roster up then nobody will come see their team play, but we are to a point with the NFL that it doesn't really matter the product you are putting on the field, people will still come watch it even if it's just for fantasy football or betting purposes.Well like Joe mentioned, Brady may very well think he's the piece that can turn this team from no hope to hopeful.
IF he was still TB12, IF he was still 'the GOAT', you stick him him with Adams- possibly the best WR he's ever played with, including Moss-, Renfrow, who is every bit the talent Welker/Edelman ever were, and Jacobs? Yeah, they may be a threat to the Chief and would definitely be a playoff contender.
However, he ain't the GOAT, he ain't TB12, he's the dude who, despite throwing almost 500 times, couldn't break 25 TD's and led a team of Evans/Godwin and Fournette to an 8-9 record in perhaps the worst division in football, backed into the playoffs because of that horrid division and then handed the Cowboys their first playoff win in what seems like forever.
I don't see it happening, I don't want it to happen. Personally I hope JimmyG's current injury turns out to be career threatening, they go with that late round rookie, ol whatshisname, and play for the #1 pick next year..and maybe the year after that too. Trade Adams, let Jacobs walk..hit that reset button, and hit that fucker hard
Look at the Bucs this year. They should have completely blown their roster up once Brady retired, but they didn't do anything.
I figure the Bucs had three options:That's probably what they should do, but some ownership has a really hard time hitting that reset button completely. Look at the Bucs this year. They should have completely blown their roster up once Brady retired, but they didn't do anything. I think a lot of it is more of an old school mentality because owners think that if they completely blow the roster up then nobody will come see their team play, but we are to a point with the NFL that it doesn't really matter the product you are putting on the field, people will still come watch it even if it's just for fantasy football or betting purposes.
that vast majority of their money comes from the TV deals and is shared equally from the Chiefs/Eagles, right on down to the Texans/Panthers, so anyone worried about actual attendance in relation to revenue is thinking ass backwards. And in Vegas's case, if attendance is any issue, why the F did they build a tiny little 65k seat stadium? Shocking that only 13 NFL stadiums have a capacity of over 70K, yet they feign concern over attendance numbers.That's probably what they should do, but some ownership has a really hard time hitting that reset button completely. Look at the Bucs this year. They should have completely blown their roster up once Brady retired, but they didn't do anything. I think a lot of it is more of an old school mentality because owners think that if they completely blow the roster up then nobody will come see their team play, but we are to a point with the NFL that it doesn't really matter the product you are putting on the field, people will still come watch it even if it's just for fantasy football or betting purposes.
Bears tanked, have momentum, but...do we actually know how good their players are?
Packers WR Romeo Doubs believes Jordan Love can do 'same exact thing' as Aaron Rodgers
Hm. Well, that's one vote.