Fantasy Football News and Rumors

[HaroldSeattle]

 

[eaglesnut]

So run him into the ground to make him financially happy? Hmmmm

Works for fantasy 2023

1.1 McCaffrey
1.2 Ekeler

 

[SmokingMonkey]

So run him into the ground to make him financially happy? Hmmmm

Works for fantasy 2023

1.1 McCaffrey
1.2 Ekeler

really close, but you have them backwards

 

[TREFF]

dude very likely has more cash on hand than the Davis Family..sad, but likely true

 

[SmokingMonkey]

dude very likely has more cash on hand than the Davis Family..sad, but likely true

how much does Giselle have to give him for alimony?

 

[FaCe-LeE-uS]

 

[eaglesnut]

really close, but you have them backwards

View attachment 329275

You're really not going to take mccaffrey in the shanny offense?

 

[FaCe-LeE-uS]

 

[TREFF]

how much does Giselle have to give him for alimony?

she did make more.... crazy as it may seem.

shocking that people piss and moan about athletes being overpaid, yet, rarely do you hear someone piss and moan about models being overpaid. and they literally just walk a runway and pose for pictures with duckfaces

 

[TREFF]

He needs that Steve Tasker special.

 

[SmokingMonkey]

she did make more.... crazy as it may seem.

shocking that people piss and moan about athletes being overpaid, yet, rarely do you hear someone piss and moan about models being overpaid. and they literally just walk a runway and pose for pictures with duckfaces

Products with her image and branding generate roughly $1 billion in annual sales. I'd say she's worth every single penny that those all those different companies are paying her. That's the other huge difference - she doesn't have one employer shelling out tens of millions per year, she has a ton of big and small contracts from various types of consumables companies that all add up.

 

[TREFF]

Products with her image and branding generate roughly $1 billion in annual sales. I'd say she's worth every single penny that those all those different companies are paying her. That's the other huge difference - she doesn't have one employer shelling out tens of millions per year, she has a ton of big and small contracts from various types of consumables companies that all add up.

all true..but they'd generate millions and billions whether it was her or any other pretty face they picked. Victoria's secret generated billions before her, and they'll generate billions after.
New England was blah before Brady, a dynasty with him, and crap without him, thus far, and squishy Mac is a good lookin' dude..he ain't Brady, but he's a good lookin' dude

Brady is(was) the product..Gisele hawks the product..one very few can do, the other, most anyone can do

 

[SmokingMonkey]

all true..but they'd generate millions and billions whether it was her or any other pretty face they picked. Victoria's secret generated billions before her, and they'll generate billions after.
New England was blah before Brady, a dynasty with him, and crap without him, thus far, and squishy Mac is a good lookin' dude..he ain't Brady, but he's a good lookin' dude

Brady is(was) the product..Gisele hawks the product..one very few can do, the other, most anyone can do

sure is a lot of words just to tell me that you don't understand the value of branding and marketing

why hasn't every model done what Gisele has done if anyone can do it?
Her career is older than most other models and she's still getting paid, kinda like TB12....even Tom Brady paid someone a lot of money to brand his initials and jersey number into the name of his business, cause he understands the value it brings.

 

[TREFF]

I dunno..its all just lip service regardless..they're all overpaid..I'm just saying I would pay to see Brady throw a football, if I buy a Tag Huer, its because its a great watch, not because Tom Brady wears one in an ad.
conversely-if I buy my wife Victoria's Secret crap, it's because its a quality product that looks nice, not because of the model in the ad.

And therefore, I feel one is much more entitled to their ridiculous salary than the other.

edited--anyone buying crap based on the face selling it, and not the merits of the product..forfeits their right to piss and moan about anyone being overpaid

 

[Chef99]

The greatest news blurb EVER!

New York, New York, baby!

Allen Lazard finished the rest of his day at OTAs at "100%" after getting "hit in the gonads" per his own Twitter account.​

He should not miss any additional time after New York media became a little panicked earlier in the day when he was surrounded by trainers and walked off the field. Lazard has our sympathy and, we hope, an ice pack for that.

 

[averagejoe]

really close, but you have them backwards

View attachment 329275

Which, if history is any indication, the #1 & 2 RB off the boards usually dont finish that way.

 

[femurov]

all true..but they'd generate millions and billions whether it was her or any other pretty face they picked. Victoria's secret generated billions before her, and they'll generate billions after.
New England was blah before Brady, a dynasty with him, and crap without him, thus far, and squishy Mac is a good lookin' dude..he ain't Brady, but he's a good lookin' dude

Brady is(was) the product..Gisele hawks the product..one very few can do, the other, most anyone can do

Well, shit. Looks like I picked the wrong career...

 

[SmokingMonkey]

Which, if history is any indication, the #1 & 2 RB off the boards usually dont finish that way.

that's why he's the ultimate cheat code, never ranked top 2 before the season starts, but keeps on ending up there when the dust settles. Can't get a better mid-1st rd pick in ppr redraft. Even the TD production keeps him top 5 in standard

2021:


2022:

 

[SmokingMonkey]

@eaglesnut - I'm definitely taking CMC 1st overall, was just providing a pro-Ekeler counterpoint. Obviously CMC missed games but that gap between Ekeler and the rest when you combine the last 2 seasons is a wild stat. He's 160pts over #2 when there's only a 35pt gap between #2 & #5

 

[eaglesnut]

@eaglesnut - I'm definitely taking CMC 1st overall, was just providing a pro-Ekeler counterpoint. Obviously CMC missed games but that gap between Ekeler and the rest when you combine the last 2 seasons is a wild stat. He's 160pts over #2 when there's only a 35pt gap between #2 & #5

So many touchdowns for such a little guy.