SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
unfortunately haley loves to throw from in close, limiting bells goal line attemptsI was high on Stacy myself. Had he been there when I picked in third, I would have taken him. I would have lost Jeffery though but probably would not have drafted CJ2k in 5th over a receiver(I would have taken Sanders likely). That situation probably still yields the same results.
Okay I just reanalyzed my games last year and if I had not kept Rodgers and took Bell and Stacy or Marshall I still would have likely won all my games I won except week 2 which ended up being a tie. I would have been 8-5 instead of 9-4-1 and since my league's standings tie-breakers are head to head, I would have been dropped to the final wild card spot and one playoff spot would have changed, the actual 6th seed out and the one that missed out on a head to head tie-breaker in. Also, the four tied were from two divisions, me and one in one and the two others in the other(out of 3 divisions). So my head to head and sweep of the guy I was tied with in my division got me in(on both accounts) but I lost head to the two in the other division. However its all irrelevant because I traded Bell.
Also, I play based on league strengths. If I was in your leagues I would certainly do things differently. I don't have to do that in my league. Having elite qb goes a long way and the way people play in that league. the RB guys want the qb before the receivers. The elite qb/elite RB/good WR is a great strategy. Had steelers gotten Bell some TDs I would not have been sweating and could have brought it all home.