Heatles84
Well-Known Member
I've viewed many of your comments and I'm a genius compared to the drivel you post.
Highly debatable. No, not really. Yours aren't better than his.
I've viewed many of your comments and I'm a genius compared to the drivel you post.
Curious as to what proof you have about Haywood being bad for team chemistry considering he played for about 5 minutes this year before snapping his ankle in half.
I've viewed many of your comments and I'm a genius compared to the drivel you post.
*Hayward*
The Celtics are better without those two.
You say that now but you'll be longing for the season come August....
I'll have Chiefs football back by then...![]()
Holy cow 103 pages..
2 games?
Any meltdowns?![]()
The Celtics certainly don't miss him.Curious as to what proof you have about Haywood being bad for team chemistry considering he played for about 5 minutes this year before snapping his ankle in half.
Likewise.Just your opinion which doesn't mean much.
The Celtics certainly don't miss him.
Really? HayWARD ruined the chemistry when he played 2 minutes at the beginning of the season? Why do you do this to yourself?
That's brilliant. The Warriors played well without Curry when they took care of round 1 and the first game of round 2 this year. So they are better without him for sure.