Heatles84
Well-Known Member
I've viewed many of your comments and I'm a genius compared to the drivel you post.
Highly debatable. No, not really. Yours aren't better than his.
I've viewed many of your comments and I'm a genius compared to the drivel you post.
Curious as to what proof you have about Haywood being bad for team chemistry considering he played for about 5 minutes this year before snapping his ankle in half.
I've viewed many of your comments and I'm a genius compared to the drivel you post.
*Hayward*
The Celtics are better without those two.
You say that now but you'll be longing for the season come August....
I'll have Chiefs football back by then...
Holy cow 103 pages..
2 games?
Any meltdowns?
The Celtics certainly don't miss him.Curious as to what proof you have about Haywood being bad for team chemistry considering he played for about 5 minutes this year before snapping his ankle in half.
Likewise.Just your opinion which doesn't mean much.
The Celtics certainly don't miss him.
Really? HayWARD ruined the chemistry when he played 2 minutes at the beginning of the season? Why do you do this to yourself?
That's brilliant. The Warriors played well without Curry when they took care of round 1 and the first game of round 2 this year. So they are better without him for sure.