- Thread starter
- #1
But was Pelini worse for the program than Callahan?
But was Pelini worse for the program than Callahan?
not even close. BO was much better than Callahan
Neither fit the culture of the program though. They were misfits in different ways. I would choose Bo's type of misfit over Caliturd any day.That's what I was thinking.
That's what I was thinking.
While Bo had better records, I'd argue he did far worse damage from a fan relations and talent standpoint. Under his watch, Nebraska football became the most polarizing topic in the state and he left us with a far worse roster than Callahan did. Bo had his best years with Callahan's players.not even close. BO was much better than Callahan
i agree with this. honestly i think if Callahan would have sucked it up and kept Bo on in the transition as the DC, that tenure might have turned out a great deal different.As someone that personally asked Demorrio Williams if Bo would be a good coach. Demorrio told me that the defense would run through a wall for Bo Pelini. Demorrio played for Bo in 2003.
Anything was better than Callahan and Cosgrove. Callahan might have been a good head coach if he fricking fired Cosgrove. But he would not do that. Fine with me, I was perfectly fine with Callahan, Cosgrove, and Steve Pederson all getting canned. They made a lot of money and were complete fuckups.
Yes, I was an acquaintance of Demorrio Williams.