LHG
Former Californian. Hesitant Tennessean.
- 19,191
- 9,070
- 533
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2015
- Location
- Somewhere in the middle of nowhere
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
I had no problem with his signing either. But he's been worse than the guy before him (Camargo) and that guy was jettisoned pretty quickly after being acquired. DeJong may have had a better reputation but that was based on hopes that he would return to a form not seen in 4 years.I have/had no problem with them signing DeJung. But it is beyond the point of folding that hand. He has been jettisoned by 2 teams already this year. Tossing him in the muck is not an admission of failure, it is just an admission that “yup, he done”.
I have never seen Fitz play, so I won’t attack or defend the org’s decision to not promote him. But on the surface, I agree, it couldn’t hurt. Unless they REALLY like him and they just want to start his clock with this year. But I can’t really defend that strategy with the evidence we have access to, sooooo…
I would lean toward the idea that the Giants DON'T think too highly of Fitzgerald. He is not young for a prospect, he is 25, so they don't need to wait on the contractual control clock on him. It feels much to me like how a previous regime handled another Tyler. This FO has tried multiple other players in the middle infield and they have not done well. Fitzgerald deserves the chance to show what he can (or cannot) do and the other options have been exhausted and don't have any reason to block him.