JDM
New Member
Being able to run is not the same as relying on it.
How is RG3 a "run first QB" when he throws it over 20 times and has designed runs (either hand off or keeps it) 10 times?
GK this guy is really hoping that we do make Rg3 a pocket passer and he really doesnt want him to run the pistol formation or the read option play . . it helps opposing defenses defend him if he doesnt have that running threat
that is what all these "RG3 's health concern " threads are designed to do .
what opposing fans havent grasped or who want to put their "finger in our eye " is that we are going to run our offense period and no amount of chatter will change it
we are not taking away a major part of a guys game away
why else would you come out and say a RC or steve young or slash were pass 1st qbs when the evidence points out otherwise ? those guys RAN the ball and defenses HAD to defend it whether they were pass 1st or not
teams couldnt sell out on the pass rush and often had to have "spies " on defense to keep their running in check
now either this guy is to young to know those players i have mentioned or he doesnt want to admit he is wrong
now i brought video evidence to the debate and he hasnt brought anything else to the table except some BS that cant be backed up .
now if you have a stat that shows running qbs are more prone to injury then put up or shut up
I didn't say he is. But one designed run all season is a risk you shouldn't take. Within the next 5 years he can be the best in the NFL as a passer. He doesn't need to be put at risk with designed runs. Let him use his athleticism as the play allows, but when you call runs for him you're fucking up. Every single time.
Because showing someone is capable of running has anything to do with how reliant on it they were.
Did you guys watch the ESPN Sunday Conversation with RG3 last night? I thought it was good that RG3 specifically mentioned the Ngata hit vs. the Ravens & the Seahawks game as reminders that he would constantly use these reminders to tell himself to do a better job of protecting himself. To me - & many others - this is is the key to his long term health.
I have no doubt that the Skins will scale down the designed runs for RG3 but not eliminate them altogether & anyone who maintains that those plays were the reasons for his injuries is pretty much clueless. His main injury was sustained when he was in the pocket & subsequently scrambled. If RG3 uses a little more common sense & keeps his ego in check he should be fine (as much as you would expect for a QB in the NFL). I feel confident that he has learned a lot in this area & will adapt accordingly.
JDM has been shown that numerous times . not once was RG3 hurt on a designed run , not once . everytime he was injured it was a result of being flushed from the pocket and being forced to move .
this is what makes JDM's statements foolish and it shows that his real motive is to not have to defend the whole RG3 package
Because showing someone is capable of running has anything to do with how reliant on it they were.
Would love to see Gruden back coaching.... just said he'd give up a first rounder for Cousins.
I didn't say he is. But one designed run all season is a risk you shouldn't take. Within the next 5 years he can be the best in the NFL as a passer. He doesn't need to be put at risk with designed runs. Let him use his athleticism as the play allows, but when you call runs for him you're fucking up. Every single time.
Afraid I have to agree with you.I didn't say he is. But one designed run all season is a risk you shouldn't take. Within the next 5 years he can be the best in the NFL as a passer. He doesn't need to be put at risk with designed runs. Let him use his athleticism as the play allows, but when you call runs for him you're fucking up. Every single time.
I'd have to agree with you, too.You make no sense what so ever. A designed run is too risky, but keeping a QB in the pocket with the one of the worst RTs in the NFL isn't. You haven't a clue about RG3 or our team, yet you come on here and act like you are some expert that has done extensive study on this subject.
You know what I think it is? I think you are whistling past the grave yard. Dad is on track. Your team has Brady and Mallett. There is an old saying, when you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Well, in your case, when you have a one dimensional pocket QB, then you can only hope that the league doesn't evolve into the need for a mobile, multidimensional QB.
Do you realize how idiotic you sound by stating the Skins should negate a major part of the capabilities that makes RG3 so great. Not that he couldn't be a very good pocket passer, but he has the potential to be a game changing QB with his multiple threats. Again, show us empirical evidence that mobile QBs get hurt more than pocket QBs. If you can't, please just STFU.