eaglesnut
Well-Known Member
The Sixers had to get their fans to buy in. What they did publicly worked. These are 32 businesses. Not one. What's the point of the competition if the league offices are picking winners and losers?Yes and no.
Obviously, the Sixers did not invent tanking. But they did embrace it to the point of giving it a name and were public about it. They even appeared to keep top draft picks out with injury for longer than was required for the injury. They did this while the league was "publicly" trying to find ways to stop tanking.
Tanking is one of those things like "load management" that everyone does and the league will mostly look the other way as long as teams don't rub their nose in it.
I don't think they should have been punished to the point they were, but the Sixers brought it on themselves.
If the leagues fix the lotteries i.e. blackawks, cavaliers, then I'm losing the plot on what their complaint is all about.
I suppose the league wants to pick where to increase revenues on a cycle that grows regions without having a league-wide plateau. Afterall, the value of these franchises is in their projected growth, not necessarily their year over year profits. So if you can grow one region and keep some of the new fans while you grow another region, then you don't just get the most hardcore basketball fans from both places. Instead, you end up with more casual fans in the winning regions and some of those casual fans turn into hardcore fans, especially young ones. For example they've grown the California basketball market with the Warriors and the "hand off" to the Nuggets will grow the Colorado market. You need a heavy amount of control to pull it off and to bring it back to the Sixers - the Sixers were seen as going their own way instead of letting the NBA offices do what they do.