purguy12
Special Agent
USC losing hurts us. Damn it.
USC isn't a quality win anymore. Only chance is Stanford now.I think running the table, with quality wins against USC and Stanford, assuming they both keep winning, would put ND right in the thick of things for the playoff. This is especially true if USC or Stanford win the PAC.
The biggest thing I think is hurting them now is the lack of a quality win. But, that's not on ND. It's unfortunate that Texas and GT are where they are at the moment.
USC isn't a quality win anymore. Only chance is Stanford now.
It is a serious waste of energy worrying about what other teams do or don't do.
USC isn't a quality win anymore. Only chance is Stanford now.
This. And I think it helps that both of USC's losses were to Pac 12 North teams. They still control their own fate in their division, and a loss to us does nothing to change that. They can still manage to come back, and a 3 loss USC team that is crowned Pac 12 champ at the end of the year would have no argument over an 11-1 ND team that beat them.At this point, the key is knocking out the two conferences we need out from the playoff. This game helps in the PAC-12 getting eliminated. If Ga. Tech beats Clemson, and then FSU loses to Clemson I think we are close to eliminating the ACC. I don't think that there are any super teams this year (which means a lot more upsets on the way), so if we close out the year with a big win against Stanford, I think we will make it in.
I mean even if Notre Dame doesn't make it to the playoff this season... they have a lot of returning starters next season with Malik Zaire coming back so next year will be a good year.
Negative, ghost rider.I mean even if Notre Dame doesn't make it to the playoff this season... they have a lot of returning starters next season with Malik Zaire coming back so next year will be a good year.
I just don't get it. Well, actually I do. We hired a coach who had absolutely zero interest in the defense. I really think you need a head coach who thoroughly understands both sides of the ball, but Sarkisian is not a defensively minded individual. We also lack that swagger and attitude that the Carroll teams had. Our offense is loaded, but at times is has no spark and goes into neutral like they did last night in the 4th quarter. It was an entertaining game, but SC just doesn't have what it takes to play a complete, four quarter game.Why does USC suck so bad? Do they still not have any depth?
Interesting ... I know another team with the similar 'feature' here.I just don't get it. Well, actually I do. We hired a coach who had absolutely zero interest in the defense. I really think you need a head coach who thoroughly understands both sides of the ball, but Sarkisian is not a defensively minded individual. We also lack that swagger and attitude that the Carroll teams had. Our offense is loaded, but at times is has no spark and goes into neutral like they did last night in the 4th quarter. It was an entertaining game, but SC just doesn't have what it takes to play a complete, four quarter game.