TheRobotDevil
Immortal
Again more "debate" and nothing to refute the facts and what the play offs would have looked like. You may prefer swim suit competions......But the data speaks for its self. 100's of pages of what team should be in. All answered within that format. If you want a true champion and more meaningful games. That would be the system to use. Its concrete to the point its irrefutable and concrete . It cant be denied by facts the data still speaks for itself........Much better than what ifs and I think insert team "looks" the best......The no more than 2 loss fail safe Auto bid with a WC is genius imoBullshit. There's nothing weaker than they literally mean nothing.
Bama playing Mercer now is better than Bama playing Oklahoma when neither team puts a single name you've ever heard of in it. Ever again.
I'd much rather have at least SOME really good OOC than literally ZERO ever again. You want to eliminate anything other than imbalanced schedules that reward whichever team is lucky enough to be on a year where they miss the harder players from the other division.
You haven't once EVER answered to that because you can't without blowing auto bids up completely.
14 teams conferences that play 8 games miss 5 teams every year. And none from the same division miss the same 5. Yet you want to treat a win against Vandy as the same as a win again Georgia. There isn't anyone in their right mind that thinks those two games should be counted as the same. It kills anything close to fairness.
It's pure dumb.