dash
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy bacon
Reports are that Terry Pegula is opening up his wallet for Babcock to coach the Sabres...
Reports are that Terry Pegula is opening up his wallet for Babcock to coach the Sabres...
That is insane money for any coach. But if ya got it, flaunt it.Reports are that Pegula is offering somewhere in the range of $5M/year with a total comp package at around $50M. Doesn't get into details, but I don't think that's a straight $5/year for 10 years deal. I'm guessing some kind of performance bonus structure or maybe some options for extensions beyond the initial terms.
Compared to apparently a $3.25M/year offer from Detroit. I know Babs says money isn't everything and he'd obviously have a much more established team in Detroit, but $1.75M/year is nothing to sneeze at.
Always thought Babcock was white, but I guess maybe the milk man wasn't?
One of the things they've talked about is that Babcock wants to get salaries up for NHL coaches in general, which might be why he'd consider a big offer like that.That is insane money for any coach. But if ya got it, flaunt it.
Yeah, but the NFL pulls more revenue in one week than the NHL does in a season. It's fine that Babcock wants to set a precedent, but how many coaches right now are in his stratosphere in regards to having the reputation as a winner that he has? 5? 10, tops?One of the things they've talked about is that Babcock wants to get salaries up for NHL coaches in general, which might be why he'd consider a big offer like that.
Consider that Coach Q is currently thought to be the highest paid coach at $2.75M, while the lowest paid NFL coach is getting $3.5M and a high of $8M and the lowest in the NBA is believed to be $2M with a high at $11M.
The NHL is pretty tight-lipped on coach salaries, but a guy like Julien - even with a Cup on his resume - is believed to be pulling only (haha, only) in the range of $1.2M.
Agreed on all points, which is why I included what I could find on NBA coaches, since that's probably the best comparable based on season, revenues, etc.Yeah, but the NFL pulls more revenue in one week than the NHL does in a season. It's fine that Babcock wants to set a precedent, but how many coaches right now are in his stratosphere in regards to having the reputation as a winner that he has? 5? 10, tops?
There have been 5 vacancies this spring, and if Babcock left that would be 6. I think McLellan got some good money from Edmonton, I know pseudo-Hextall didn't get much as a rookie coach. Wherever Babcock lands, there will still be 3 vacancies and 2 of those will be for rebuilding teams and will likely be assistant coaches from other teams that fill them. None of them will be getting anywhere near Babcock money. 8 coaches were hired after the end of last season; of them I'd say maybe Lavy and Trotz got good money. It's always going to be a small number of guys that owners will shell out for.
Cup-winning coach named Randy was getting some decent money until recently...Agreed on all points, which is why I included what I could find on NBA coaches, since that's probably the best comparable based on season, revenues, etc.
I think that's probably what he's going for is to try to pull NHL coaches into that same general range as what NBA guys are getting. You figure if a Cup winning coach like Julien is getting significantly less than an entry-level NBA guy, there's a definite room for growth.
I thought we were out?@DarrenDreger: Toronto and Buffalo in bidding war for Babcock. No decision yet. Hearing Red Wings final offer was 5 years at $4 million per.
I thought we were out?
Jesus Shanny let it go. All hiring him would do is create unbelievably high expectations that the team will never ever match.
Possibly, but it's not like one job is dreamier than the other right now.I think Babcock is just using the leafs to up the price much like many use the canucks in bidding to up their price for an elite player but never seriously want to have them go there.
Possibly, but it's not like one job is dreamier than the other right now.
That's very true, but at the same time I can see a scenario where despite their current situations Buffalo and Toronto both return to playoff contention at the same time given that Buffalo's roster still needs some work to get to a place where they can compete (defence and still need a goalie), and Toronto still has a lot of pieces they could move to teams on the verge of contention in exchange for young talent rather than draft picks. Obviously Eichel should give Buffalo a much larger advantage assuming he makes the jump to the NHL immediately and is able to hit the ground running, but Toronto could manoeuvre themselves towards Buffalo's level of progression quickly if the right moves are made.I suppose Buffalo is a better option for more success quicker. They have an elite prospect coming in this draft. have some decent players now and with babcock in charge some smarter decisions could be made this off season. Toronto needs an implosion
I suppose Buffalo is a better option for more success quicker. They have an elite prospect coming in this draft. have some decent players now and with babcock in charge some smarter decisions could be made this off season. Toronto needs an implosion