Nothing wrong with that position......but as I said, I'll take the guy that doesn't lose in bowl games, and was better statistically. Tebow was a great player. But he was no VY.
Hell, I'd take Cam Newton over Tebow as well, if we're talking a ONE game scenario.
Dude, Tebow lost one bowl game on a Florida team that was extremely young and was replacing a ton of players from the 06 title team. Stop acting like he choked or something. That Michigan team was full of seniors and, for the first time all season, fully healthy.
VY was shutout against an Oklahoma team that several other Big XII teams were able to get to (Oklahoma State, Kansas State and A&M averaged 30 ppg in their 3 matchups). He also was a liability in 04 in Big XII play quite a bit - his games against Oklahoma, Kansas (WTF), Missouri, and A&M were atrocious!
Career:
VY - 38 TD, 21 INT
Tebow: 88 TD, 16 INT
His overall stats blew away VY, and it's not even close.
He also played a lot more games, as you yourself have already pointed out.
Once again, this is about a ONE GAME scenario. In that scenario, VY's track record is better, there really is no debate on that.
VY didn't lose at home to an unranked team......he didn't lose a bowl game. And he had arguably one of the greatest performances in a NCG ever.
Tebow is a great player. But in this SPECIFIC scenario, VY is a better choice. You're free to take Tebow. VY will still be the better choice.
The fact that Young was a liability several times makes me hesitant. Football is a team game and that one game you point out (Ole Miss), Tebow still had a great game (3 TDs, no turnovers). I'd take that over a QB that had several wins DESPITE him, like VY had all over the place in 2004. Tebow had several more starts, yet several less turnovers, playing against much tougher defenses. What does that say?
Damn. Dorsey lost 1 game his entire career and doesn't make the top 10. Also, that one loss was highly suspect. Methinks this list takes nfl play into account.
Agreed. I thought the list was pretty good but that one stood out. Dorsey was the real deal in cfb - a HELL of alot better than some of those on the list like Sam Bradford. And I am no Miami fan by any means...
Dorsey better than Sam Bradford? I HATE OU but you're out of your mind, that's almost outright LAUGHABLE
Bradford was a freaking BEAST. DAMN I hated that guy
34 game winning streak, B2B NCGs, Heisman finalist twice (Crouch, really), O'brien winner. Just sayin.
Bradford only played 2 years. I can see your argument, Crouch was good but those Miami teams were loaded.
As long as Michael Vick is there Dixon will continue to develop really good clipboard holding skills.
What about NFL careers? This is how I would classify:
Really Good
D Brees, Eli Manning, B Roethlisberger, A Rodgers
Proven
M Vick, Phil Rivers, Matt Ryan, Alex Smith (close call)
Unproven Level A
A Luck, RG3, S Bradford, Russ Wilson, C Kaepernick, C Newton, A Dalton
Unproven Level B
T Tebow, B Weeden
Unproven Level C
Kellen Moore, C Keenum, Chase Daniel, G Harrell
Meh/no-go
C Weinke, V Young, M Leinart, C McCoy, Pat White, J Heupel, Ken Dorsey, C Leak,Brad Smith (played some wildcat, WR), E Crouch, Troy Smith, David Greene, Joe Hamilton, Randle El (no-go as a QB), Dan LeFevour, Todd Reesing, Chad Pennington, Jason White (never made squad, btw), Joey Harrington, Brian Johnson (never signed)