- Thread starter
- #281
BigKen
Day to Day
If he's claimed and refuses to report, he's done for the year. I'd claim his ass and he'd sit home and watch the games on TV if he didn't report. Wouldn't have to pay him either.
Very interesting point was made on ESPN the other day.
They said that the Patriots were not competitive in the playoffs and the four teams that made it to the conference finals all had one thing in common that the patriots did not................At least one poroductive tight end. They said it was surprising that the Patriots finished at 12-4 and could have finished 13-3 but not having that one piece spelled their doom in the regular season and the playoffs.
We all knew that they needed one, but not having any TE that was at all productive, was more detrimental than I thought before I heard that piece.
I would say that is a bit of a narrow focus of what happened to the Patriots this year. There were more issues than just not having a TE. WR core struggled and showed they didn't know the offense. OL was about as bad as I have seen in NE in a long time. And Tom Brady just is not the same QB he was say 5 years ago. Since 2016 he has seen a pretty steep decline.
I would say that is a bit of a narrow focus of what happened to the Patriots this year. There were more issues than just not having a TE. WR core struggled and showed they didn't know the offense. OL was about as bad as I have seen in NE in a long time. And Tom Brady just is not the same QB he was say 5 years ago. Since 2016 he has seen a pretty steep decline.
I disagree about TB. Not that you are necessarily incorrect, but the other factors make it difficult to know. Poor reliability in receivers, poor reliability of OL then the run game suffered from the OL play causing a predictable offense.
Look, we know he's old. You are not a genius to point it out.
I would not say steep decline but damn sure in decline. And the WRs to include JE can not get any separation and you are correct TE play was fair at the very most. We have two rookie WRs, Sanu cam mid season there was no timing and it appeared team struggles with the playbook. TB kept looking for a banged up JE and defense knew this.
When we lost Andrews it created make shift lines yeah the O Line was sub par this year which had a huge affect.
There are a lot of need for this team and not a lot of room with cap space and draft power. BB has taken two at one position several time in the past he may double down on TE this year and clean out some trash. Perhaps Round one and three.
Agreed. All of that together led to a very pedestrian offense this year. The idea of just pointing to the TE position and saying "fix that and the offense will function well" to me just is ignoring the full picture of this past season. I know the Patriots are smarter than that and some of the issues should be fixed just by guys being in the system a 2nd year. Going to be interesting to see if the Patriots are willing to keep the same offensive system though if Brady is gone. I doubt there are many that can handle that entire system year 1.
I would say that is a bit of a narrow focus of what happened to the Patriots this year. There were more issues than just not having a TE. WR core struggled and showed they didn't know the offense. OL was about as bad as I have seen in NE in a long time. And Tom Brady just is not the same QB he was say 5 years ago. Since 2016 he has seen a pretty steep decline.
Don't take this personally, but pointing out the pats had TE deficiencies is back to "not needing to be a genuis" to make that call. They just lost the best TE to ever play when you factor both his contributions to the line and the passing attack. Add to that they did a piss poor job of even fielding a mediocre TE. But just isolate the impact of losing Gronk especially when you see the struggle the line had for the run game, when you see all the doubles Edelman saw and finally the direct loss of him as a play maker.Agreed. All of that together led to a very pedestrian offense this year. The idea of just pointing to the TE position and saying "fix that and the offense will function well" to me just is ignoring the full picture of this past season. I know the Patriots are smarter than that and some of the issues should be fixed just by guys being in the system a 2nd year. Going to be interesting to see if the Patriots are willing to keep the same offensive system though if Brady is gone. I doubt there are many that can handle that entire system year 1.
Don't take this personally, but pointing out the pats had TE deficiencies is back to "not needing to be a genuis" to make that call. They just lost the best TE to ever play when you factor both his contributions to the line and the passing attack. Add to that they did a piss poor job of even fielding a mediocre TE. But just isolate the impact of losing Gronk especially when you see the struggle the line had for the run game, when you see all the doubles Edelman saw and finally the direct loss of him as a play maker.
I know you are knowledgeable football guy... I do. But these expert opinions are just not insightful.
ESPN was highlighting all of the TEs that were in the championship games and the Patriots took a side shot.
It was a pretty bad group of TEs that the Pats put out there.