- Thread starter
- #121
mr.hockey4242
Well-Known Member
ESPN just posted an article (with Andy Katz) talking about who could "take over and win a NC by themselves", and he highlights NWG. And this is exactly what I'm talking about. Why him? Because he goes 15.7 ppg and 4.6 apg, and 5+ boards? Does he have a high efficiency rating or points per possession? Awesome.
When has he EVER taken a game over away from home against a ranked opponent? Has he? When has he done it against a top ten team? I mean ever. When has he controlled the game and made the most important baskets in the last minute to carry his team to victory? When has he made the last shot to win a game against one of the best teams in the game? Never. He's not done any of it even once, for UW or for GU. Kid's 22 and never done it.
Now, am I dooming him? Absolutely not. He's quite a talent. I've watched him his whole college career. He's definitely a solid player both scoring and passing. Can he take over and win the NC by himself? I suppose. It's happened before out of the blue. But am I going to at all believe that he can do it going in? How can I, he's never done it before, let alone in March, let alone in a late round. He's been largely below average in his games against top teams outside the state of Washington.
I get that it's easy to look at the #1 undefeated team and say, 'yeah, their best scorer should be able to do it', but he hasn't ever even shown that he can, let alone do it in multiple games to a FF or NC.
Can he, sure, why not. But if he does, it'll be his first game doing so (let alone however many it takes). How are people lining up to say this is at all a safe prediction?
It's the same thing with Gonzaga in general. Nothing has shown me that they can do what people are saying they can. They could surprise for sure, but nothing leads me to believe that I should anticipate them--going in--to get much into the second half of the dance.
I really, really fucking hope this is sarcastic