ArlingtonCowboys100
Goodell is a polesmoker
What evidence?Maybe if there was a complete lack of any evidence. That's not the case here.
What evidence?Maybe if there was a complete lack of any evidence. That's not the case here.
Other than Roger, has anyone who has reviewed this case thought Zeke should be suspended? Even the courts that overturn rulings in his favor say they are doing it only because of the power of his officeWhat evidence?
only evidence I'm aware of is the police didn't want to pursue this and the NFL's lead investigater, who happened to be female, was the only person on the investigating committee who bothered to interview the crazy bitch said Elliott should NOT be suspended cause the crazy bitch was not trustworthy.The court is not going to evaluate the merits of his suspension or whether there was sufficient evidence to suspend him. The question is whether the process was fair to Elliott.
only evidence I'm aware of is the police didn't want to pursue this and the NFL's lead investigater, who happened to be female, was the only person on the investigating committee who bothered to interview the crazy bitch said Elliott should NOT be suspended cause the crazy bitch was not trustworthy.
perhaps if he was an eagle, you'd see the point.....take your shit down the hall
What evidence?
only evidence I'm aware of is the police didn't want to pursue this and the NFL's lead investigater, who happened to be female, was the only person on the investigating committee who bothered to interview the crazy bitch said Elliott should NOT be suspended cause the crazy bitch was not trustworthy.
perhaps if he was an eagle, you'd see the point.....take your shit down the hall
There isn't any... Goodell is a dictator.
The only person in the NFL office to interview his accuser recommended no suspension. I bet if she said a year suspension was in order Roger would have listened to her. If you're not going to listen to your lead investigator, and you won't interview her yourself, why was she even interviewed in the first placeWe've been down this rabbit hole. There is some evidence. Obviously, Cowboys fans don't think it's sufficient to suspend the guy for 6 games and, to be honest, you guys are probably right. But the NFL is the one that gets to decide what is sufficient to suspend him 6 games. And the courts aren't going to weigh the evidence against Elliott in relation to the domestic violence allegations / other incidents. They're going to determine whether the process was fair to Elliott. If it was, the NFL should win.
This is just my opinion but after reading his arguments, I don't think he's got a very strong case against the NFL. The circumstances are a bit unfair to him, especially given how inconsistently the NFL has applied the domestic violence policy. Overall, though, the process and procedures utilized by the NFL seem to have been fair. I suppose we'll see what the court decides sometime soon.
The only person in the NFL office to interview his accuser recommended no suspension. I bet if she said a year suspension was in order Roger would have listened to her. If you're not going to listen to your lead investigator, and you won't interview her yourself, why was she even interviewed in the first place
That's BS, and if it were Wentz instead of Zeke you'd say is was BS tooNot sure -- but her job isn't to determine the length of the suspension so, although that fact looks good for Elliott, I'm not sure how much legal relevance her recommendation has.
That's BS, and if it were Wentz instead of Zeke you'd say is was BS too
LMFAO, what a jackass. Wentz can't be falsely accused? Why, because he's a white boy? He doesn't like girls? Come on dudeIt's not BS. I think you're overvaluing the lead investigator's recommendation.
Wentz wouldn't be in this situation.
exactly. Roger made no attempt to interview the woman, or listen to the lead investigator, who actually interviewed her. Here are the facts: The woman tried to blackmail Zeke, No charges filed by police, Lead invesitgator interviews victim and recommends no suspension, however, Roger does not inteveiw victim, but suspends Zeke 6 games. That is beyond stupid.The only person in the NFL office to interview his accuser recommended no suspension. I bet if she said a year suspension was in order Roger would have listened to her. If you're not going to listen to your lead investigator, and you won't interview her yourself, why was she even interviewed in the first place
LMFAO, what a jackass. Wentz can't be falsely accused? Why, because he's a white boy? He doesn't like girls? Come on dude
Spin it however you like. If it were Wentz, with the same LACK of evidence, you'd cry a river hypocriteHow about this? Wentz isn't in this situation and has never been in this situation.
How many NFL players are falsely accused of domestic violence in any given season? Poor Zeke, he's just a victim of this evil, malicious girl, right? You've got no clue if these are false accusations or not. I can't think of the last time it was uncovered that an NFL player was falsely accused of domestic violence.
To bring race into this is idiotic. It has nothing to do with that. Wentz is, by all accounts, an overall good person. Elliot is, by all accounts, an immature person that constantly puts himself in situations where something can go wrong. He's also possibly a criminal domestic abuser but we can't say for sure. But yeah, it has to do with race. Pathetic to bring up race here.
Spin it however you like. If it were Wentz, with the same LACK of evidence, you'd cry a river hypocrite
You aren't breaking any news here Dude, everyone on this board knows it's not about guilt or innocence but about the power of the Commissioners office. The difference is, this is a witch hunt. Let's say a disgruntled ex girlfriend of Wentz, some chick from his hometown that he told her he loved in High School, calls him and says she wants $100,000 or she will say he RAPED her. He says no. She goes to the press. The police won't file charges, the NFL lead investigator says she is a fraud...and then Roger suspends Wentz for two years. You good with that? If not, the STFUI already told you that you guys are probably right that the amount of evidence doesn't warrant a 6-game suspension -- but that's not what the court is going to be focusing on. His best chance to have the suspension reduced was with Harold Henderson and that didn't happen.
You aren't breaking any news here Dude, everyone on this board knows it's not about guilt or innocence but about the power of the Commissioners office. The difference is, this is a witch hunt. Let's say a disgruntled ex girlfriend of Wentz, some chick from his hometown that he told her he loved in High School, calls him and says she wants $100,000 or she will say he RAPED her. He says no. She goes to the press. The police won't file charges, the NFL lead investigator says she is a fraud...and then Roger suspends Wentz for two years. You good with that? If not, the STFU
JackassI didn't realize that Elliott's accuser waited 5+ years to come forward with allegations against him. Great hypothetical.
It really is news to you guys. Cowboys fans can't accept that Elliott seems like a shitty person. This probably won't be his last battle with the commissioner's office.