UK Cowboy
Happy Father's Day T-Roy
It will be interesting. If the court ends up ruling after the suspension, he would have a serious defamation case....but he would also have to turn over cell phone and email records that he didn't have to turn in to the NFL during all of this.I don't think that is as likely to be successful as you do. It all depends on exactly what the court rules. People get convictions overturned on appeal often in our court system. Some are able to sue and win money and some aren't. One difference is that Zeke's "damages" are easily quantifiable from a monetary perspective. In this case I'm not sure if he would win anything unless they not only ruled the suspension did not follow the proper procedure in place but also found intent on Goodell or the league's part. I don't think that is likely. There is zero doubt that there was enough evidence for them to explain why they started the investigation. There was a Police investigation too. We can agree or not on how they handled it or whether we believe the "victim" but there was likely enough evidence for THEM to state THEY felt a suspension was warranted (much lower threshold than criminal case) after their investigation even if we look at the same evidence and very strongly disagree. And my recollection is that there is no provision in the league disciplinary process for less than 6 games. They made DV an automatic 6 game suspension. So the idea that it should have been 2 or 3 is faulty to me. IMO it is all or nothing.
The court wouldn't likely have to agree with their decision to suspend and could overturn it and possibly still leave Zeke unlikely to win money via a lawsuit. I would imagine at the very least he could try to recoup the game checks but that wouldn't even come from the league. Perhaps legal fees from the league? But I don't think he could sue for damages to let's say his reputation. The "facts" of the case are what can be argued as damaging and they mostly came out from the Police investigation. So I don't think he has much of a case there. And if he gets back his 6 game checks it doesn't really help the Cowboys because we can't replay those 6 games. The part I disagree with is why the court would agree to let his appeal be heard but not feel the need to put the suspension on hold. This is clearly conflicting to me and doesn't pass the common sense test even if there is legal justification for it. But this also works against him in a civli suit because even the court is agreeing to let the suspension be heard.