Albert Pujols tops list of MLB's biggest albatrosses

[Omar 382]

Everyone LOL at the jackass attacking someone's screen name when he realizes he's wrong^^^

 

[Villain]

@mr.hockey4242 Just FYI you're way wrong on this one. It's a no brainer on Pujols' deal being worse. Not even close.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

Everyone LOL at the jackass attacking someone's screen name when he realizes he's wrong^^^

You fucking attacked mine.

You referenced 9 year old jokes.

You referenced Pujols and then defended Cano.

You got on me for "name calling" when you do it.

Look up the term hypocrite. Then try irony.

 

[Omar 382]

You fucking attacked mine.

You referenced 9 year old jokes.

You referenced Pujols and then defended Cano.

You got on me for "name calling" when you do it.

Look up the term hypocrite. Then try irony.

Ding ding ding! Another time you claim I did/said something I never did/say. I never attacked your name. I referenced it to say that you should stick to the sport you apperantly like the most. Not an attack by even the biggest stretch possible.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

@mr.hockey4242 Just FYI you're way wrong on this one. It's a no brainer on Pujols' deal being worse. Not even close.

About what? Pujols has contributed where Nolasco hasn't?

Saying Using Greinke improving to say Nolasco can is dumb.

Saying that the length and price of deal isn't always the worst.

Saying that He defended Canos contract right now. When you could have Brian Dozier? Or shit Jason Kipnis has to be much cheaper...since he likes cheap.

Saying that you can't just project stats(although I wish you could. Park would be a steal for the twins).

Which of those is wrong?

 

[mr.hockey4242]

Ding ding ding! Another time you claim I did/said something I never did/say. I never attacked your name. I referenced it to say that you should stick to the sport you apperantly like the most. Not an attack by even the biggest stretch possible.

I reference your name too lol.

No comment on the insults? Me using 9 year old "stats" while you use 9 year old "jokes"?

Still ignoring Cano?

 

[Villain]

About what? Pujols has contributed where Nolasco hasn't?

Saying Using Greinke improving to say Nolasco can is dumb.

Saying that the length and price of deal isn't always the worst.

Saying that He defended Canos contract right now. When you could have Brian Dozier? Or shit Jason Kipnis has to be much cheaper...since he likes cheap.

Saying that you can't just project stats(although I wish you could. Park would be a steal for the twins).

Which of those is wrong?

I literally don't care about any of those extraneous things that you just spewed out.

I'll keep it simple. Pujols' deal with the Angels is worse than Nolasco's deal with the Twins. That's it.

 

[Omar 382]

I reference your name too lol.

No comment on the insults? Me using 9 year old "stats" while you use 9 year old "jokes"?

Still ignoring Cano?

Using gay slurs is uncomparable to using HR to measure a players' worth in a measure of baseball intelligence. Maybe ethics or morals would be affected but not baseball intelligence.

I called you a jackass after I dismantled your entire argument. You used them when you realized you were wrong.

I already devoted two paragraphs to a Pujols/Cano comp.

 

[Omar 382]

I literally don't care about any of those extraneous things that you just spewed out.

I'll keep it simple. Pujols' deal with the Angels is worse than Nolasco's deal with the Twins. That's it.

Don't even waste your time. The guy is delusional

 

[mr.hockey4242]

Using gay slurs is uncomparable to using HR to measure a players' worth in a measure of baseball intelligence. Maybe ethics or morals would be affected but not baseball intelligence.

I called you a jackass after I dismantled your entire argument. You used them when you realized you were wrong.

I already devoted two paragraphs to a Pujols/Cano comp.

No you called it a 9 year old thing. People who make a name of gay jokes is kinda a 9 year old thing....ya dig?

You dismantled my argument by using a Cy Young to compare to a guy who can't pitch in one of baseballs worst rotations.

Pujols at 32>Cano at 32.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

I literally don't care about any of those extraneous things that you just spewed out.

I'll keep it simple. Pujols' deal with the Angels is worse than Nolasco's deal with the Twins. That's it.

I didn't spew them out. He did. They are all right there for you to read.

It's a yes or no question.

Does Zack Grienke improving correlate to Ricky Nolasco improving?

Does Robinson Cano have a awful contract relative to second basemen around him?

What's better, projected stats or the actual ones after he games were played. Ok, that's not yes or no. But still 1 word is needed.

 

[Villain]

I didn't spew them out. He did. They are all right there for you to read.

It's a yes or no question.

Does Zack Grienke improving correlate to Ricky Nolasco improving?

Does Robinson Cano have a awful contract relative to second basemen around him?

What's better, projected stats or the actual ones after he games were played. Ok, that's not yes or no. But still 1 word is needed.

I don't care. The debate was between Pujols and Nolasco. Pujols is worst. If you want to tell me I'm wrong about that, give it a shot.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

Also, I "literally" don't care. Thanks for clarifying. With out literally. I would though "I don't care" means you do care.

 

[Omar 382]

No you called it a 9 year old thing. People who make a name of gay jokes is kinda a 9 year old thing....ya dig?

You dismantled my argument by using a Cy Young to compare to a guy who can't pitch in one of baseballs worst rotations.

Pujols at 32>Cano at 32.

Cano 2014-2023>Pujols 2012-2021

 

[Villain]

Also, I "literally" don't care. Thanks for clarifying. With out literally. I would though "I don't care" means you do care.

So, tell me why you think Nolasco's deal is worse than Pujols' deal.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

I don't care. The debate was between Pujols and Nolasco. Pujols is worst. If you want to tell me I'm wrong about that, give it a shot.

I don't care. The debate was between Pujols and Nolasco. Pujols is worst. If you want to tell me I'm wrong about that, give it a shot.

No the debate has been all of the above.

He defended Cano. Bashed Pujols.

They are one in the same. Can be replaced with more productive players.

Nolasco doesn't even require money. Use Duffey.

He suggest Calhoun for Pujols. A guy already in the lineup. Great logic.

 

[Villain]

No the debate has been all of the above.

He defended Cano. Bashed Pujols.

They are one in the same. Can be replaced with more productive players.

Nolasco doesn't even require money. Use Duffey.

He suggest Calhoun for Pujols. A guy already in the lineup. Great logic.

You guys had some nonsense side bullshit that I don't want to waste my time reading. This all started Pujols/Nolasco so I'm bringing it back to the start and throwing your side journeys out the window (I don't care about them, remember?).

If you want to just give up now and admit that you were wrong and now you agree that Pujols' deal is worse than Nolasco's deal, then that's fine, too. Then we can be done here.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

Cano 2014-2023>Pujols 2012-2021

Projecting again!!!

Dozier 2015-2019>Cano 2014-2023. And Dozier sucks for basically half a season.

You said Canos contract isn't bad yet. When a decent player has a clear better contract for similar production.

And you compared Grienke to Nolasco.

It really can't get worse than that.

 

[mr.hockey4242]

You guys had some nonsense side bullshit that I don't want to waste my time reading. This all started Pujols/Nolasco so I'm bringing it back to the start and throwing your side journeys out the window (I don't care about them, remember?).

If you want to just give up now and admit that you were wrong and now you agree that Pujols' deal is worse than Nolasco's deal, then that's fine, too. Then we can be done here.

It's not side bullsht lol. He actually stated that Canos contract wasn't bad yet 3 pages before I even entered this thread. His reasoning for Pujols being bad was he "projected" Pujols and "projected" Nolasco based on one of baseballs best pitchers. They weren't side argument. He fucking used it as proof.

It's a yes or no question. Because Grienke improved his ERA relative to his FIP does that mean Nolasco will? I'll settle for maybe.

This started because he's looking for fights on Pujols. All I did was throw out that Nolasco has a God awful contract and doesn't even perform. And yet Cano is a fine deal in his eyes.

 

[Villain]

It's not side bullsht lol. He actually stated that Canos contract wasn't bad yet 3 pages before I even entered this thread. His reasoning for Pujols being bad was he "projected" Pujols and "projected" Nolasco based on one of baseballs best pitchers. They weren't side argument. He fucking used it as proof.

It's a yes or no question. Because Grienke improved his ERA relative to his FIP does that mean Nolasco will? I'll settle for maybe.

This started because he's looking for fights on Pujols. All I did was throw out that Nolasco has a God awful contract and doesn't even perform. And yet Cano is a fine deal in his eyes.

Are you fucking kidding me? I feel like I'm talking to a wall.

PUJOLS or NOLASCO. Which one is worse?

GO.