And if you replace a 3-9 FCS opponent with a 7-5 in conference game and add one loss to the three opponents, what do you think that would do to the SoS ?
Here's two conferences. Conference Xray plays a 5 game conference schedule. Conference Zulu plays a 4 game conference schedule. Which conference is going to suffer more conference losses?
When you play a team with more losses your SOS drops. The NCAA formula goes by win losses. More conference games means more losses within said conference. That sh1t isn't debatable. It's basic fvcking math that anyone with a 3rd grade education or higher should be able to figure out within seconds. Again it's basic math.
The BCS formula is just one example. It translates into the current system as well.This is where you are missing the point tho. You are looking at it as tho it pertains to one team.=
The BCS never once did try and explain their formula ... same goes with this bs playoff committee. When you explain a formula that doesn't actually exist it means you can't rig the system.
So here's some basic math, most SoS formulas give you a 0 score for playing an FCS team. So a horrible basic formula that does W/L of opponents, let's say they went 5-6 ( again no win for FCS) that equals out to .83. Now half of those teams go 6-6 with no FCS game and the other half goes 5-7 with the extra loss. That gives you a .85, basic math.
I could give two shits less about FCS teams. This is about 9 vs 8 game conference schedule.
I added the fucking 9 game conference schedule game you idiot. I turned the FCS game into a conference game and showed you the math that it could raise the SoS. You said it would be near impossible for the FCS game to be scheduled because they had their own conference games to deal with, which you are wrong about by the way. So tell me where my basic math is wrong.
Yet all the explanations about how a rematch game can occur in a BCS championship game. Was SOS and the polls putting Alabama over. Including the coaches poll. Where saban voted Oklahoma State 4th behind Stanford. That whole system was flawed
I never said anything of the like. I said scheduling late season OOC games is a major pain in the ass when you and your conference play a 9 game conference schedule.
It's all about TV sets hence Ohio St. going in over Penn St. last season.
They already instituted a play off system because the BCS system was so flawed.And with the way everything played out last season.I'm expecting more revisions.Most likely in the selection process as well as play off expansion imo
Everything is all about the money...or the lack of it in my team's situation.
Sounds good to me. 10 P5s by all P5s would be good whether they play 8 or 9 conference games. After that, let 'em play two FCS teams if they want. They will anyway. Many P5 teams claim philanthropy as the reason they play FCS teams in the first place.
Some PAC teams play one or two P5 OOC teams and one FCS team. Washington plays one P5, one G5 and one FCS team this season as far as OOC games go.
