cwalke3408
Well-Known Member
I never said UGA should go to a 9 conferece schedule AND have 11 P5 opponents scheduled. Could =/= should. This is like the 4th or 5th time now. I said that they could if those games are important to them. But that I would rather see uniformity in CFB. Either everyone at 8 or everyone at 9. Given that conference games are more important and guarantee a P5 opponent, I prefer that. Again (hopefully for the last time), this is my opinion, I never said 'hey UGA, you guys need to go to 9 conference schedule, continue to play GT and you better schedule another P5 opponent every year too'. Never happened.
I agree that it would be nice to have some uniformity and I think we all can agree that everyone going to 10 P5 opponents would be nice. But I have to disagree in believing the difference between 8 or 9 conf. games is a huge deal, 10 P5 opponents is 10 P5 opponents. I see your point on 9 conf. games but I think I like the appeal of everyone having 8 conf. and 2 P5 OOC. Most conferences are top heavy anyway and most teams are out of conf. title contentions before the season starts. For me I don't see the appeal of watching in-conf. team A (who don't have a shot at the conf. title) vs in-conf. team B (who don't have a shot at the conf. title). Atleast with the OOC games we get the chance to conference thump our chest which we like to do.
Also there's no chance or point for the SEC or ACC to go to 9 conf. games, so when are the PAC, BIG 12, and BIG 10 moving to 8?