msgkings322
I'm just here to troll everyone
What a fascinating anecdoteI don't hate either team.
What a fascinating anecdoteI don't hate either team.
Sounds like New Orleans took the only sensible position here:
And you're right BUT that doesn't equate to the truth in practical application . The 2 could end up being Evan Turner , Jabari Parker , Derrick Williams , Michael Kidd-Gilchtist, Anthony Bennett just as easily as it could be someone better than Ingramyes...i am saying that- that the #2 overall pick is more valuable than an 18 and 5 guy- without a doubt 100%.
its just crazy to me hte value some of these Lakers fans are attaching to some of these guys.Hate to break the news to you but I hate the Celtics WAYYY more than the Lakers.
You just think the Lakers young players are much better than most people do.
Sounds like New Orleans took the only sensible position here:
- They were in no rush
- There is great reason to believe they can get a better market for AD later on in the summer
- Therefore, only a GINORMOUS offer would be considered at this point in time
- Therefore, they demanded a GINORMOUS offer from the Lakers
Ball is a PG that cant shoot
Untrue. If the Knicks pick drops below 3rd, or the Celtics hold back Tatum, the Lakers could very easily reduce their offer as well. Davis could also directly say that he will ONLY sign with the Lakers in 2020. That would cause ALL offers to come crashing down.
Huh?Yep, no homerism present in this post!
Lakers are still willing to deal, just not going to bid against themselves. Will address a counter offer if it comes.
Having a below average player under team control doesn't mean much . There are more 2 picks worse or equal to Ingram over the past 15 years than there are guys better than him . Basically youre valuing the 2 while saying you wouldn't trade Davis for 2 guys who went 1 and 2 lol. The pick is only as good as the guy you get with it and statistically you're unlikely to hit on a guy guy better than Ingram OR Kuzma.ddo you know how many guys average 18 and 5?
Jamal Murray, Gallo, Kuzma, Lou Willims, Russell, Randle, Conley, Harris, Vucevic, Holliday, are just a few---- and none of them- NONE of them, could be traded for the #2 overall pick
to look at raw statistics is a pretty meaningless exercise.
its the potential ceiling, its the cost certainty, its KNOWING you will have the guy for x years for a cheap contract--- there is so much more that goes into it that you are just ignoring.
but you HAVE to take that chance.Having a below average player under team control doesn't mean much . There are more 2 picks worse or equal to Ingram over the past 15 years than there are guys better than him . Basically youre valuing the 2 while saying you wouldn't trade Davis for 2 guys who went 1 and 2 lol. The pick is only as good as the guy you get with it and statistically you're unlikely to hit on a guy guy better than Ingram OR Kuzma.
No I dont and from the beginning I have said that the Pelicans would be smarter to wait. Dont put words In my mouth. If Davis were to remain firm, then no the Pelicans cant and won't do better, but we know Davis to the Lakers is a tactic to force the trade and AD will change his mind about the Lakers just like Paul George did and that is why the Pelicans can do betterHate to break the news to you but I hate the Celtics WAYYY more than the Lakers.
You just think the Lakers young players are much better than most people do.
The Pelicans were set to take the Lakers to the cleaners. It wasnt smart for the Lakers to trade now. Much smarter to sign a second all star and then trade for the third marquee player This SummerGood. Finally . Common sense
They already have that guy though and haven't won more than 1 playoff series with him . In today's league you either have 3 or 4 great guys OR you have Lebron. That's how you win . AD is probably the best player in the league and they've done zero with him so if you're NO you either decide to try to compete or you go full Philly and tank for 3 years and pray . Neither are great options but that's pretty much all you've got to choose frombut you HAVE to take that chance.
Ingram and Kuzma arent going to make you championship contenders- they are building blocks
you HAVE to roll the dice and try and get that franchise cornerstone or its all for nothing anyway.
Similarly with the Celtics--- if the Celtics offer Tatum, a lotto pick (the Sacramento pick) say Rozier, and a couple other firsts, id rather have that package than the Lakers package.
He's got his shooting percentages up a bit, but really his other stats are pretty much the same. Taking 2 more shots, 1 more assist, but that's about it.