Iffster
Dude
[QUOTE="TrustMeIamRight, post: 8731747, member: 4274"
The question I would be asking if I were a Cleveland fan is -- why won't the Indians dump Gomes if they could have dealt for Lucroy?[/QUOTE]
That is the core of the story. If, as Lucroy stated, the Indians did not insure Lucroy the starting catcher position in 2017, then the onus is on Cleveland. Now...does Cleveland answer Lucroy's claims? If not, I walk away with the impression that POSSIBLY the Tribe made a mistake. If Antonetti was trying to keep both (knowing Lucroy had a veto) he mis-calculated. HAS Antonelli stated his side of the story?
The question I would be asking if I were a Cleveland fan is -- why won't the Indians dump Gomes if they could have dealt for Lucroy?[/QUOTE]
That is the core of the story. If, as Lucroy stated, the Indians did not insure Lucroy the starting catcher position in 2017, then the onus is on Cleveland. Now...does Cleveland answer Lucroy's claims? If not, I walk away with the impression that POSSIBLY the Tribe made a mistake. If Antonetti was trying to keep both (knowing Lucroy had a veto) he mis-calculated. HAS Antonelli stated his side of the story?