SeattleOspreys
New Member
So which WRs do belong on the week 1 roster?
Are you going to resort to bringing up the last Seahawks SB win?
After Boldin, flip a coin. Do you count 2005?
So which WRs do belong on the week 1 roster?
Are you going to resort to bringing up the last Seahawks SB win?
Like Jamarcus or Kijana Carter were better picks because they played a little, LOL
If Jenkins is indeed cut...
Would be he in discussion for worst first round draft pick of all time ?
I think it would have to be debated, because of the fact that he drafted, never contributed at all without anything like injuries, holdouts (Bo Jackson) etc...
This would have been a guy that never was able even able to MAKE the team.
Anything is debatable.... including whether or not you are an Arizona Cardinal fan troll showing unusual interest in telling 49er fans how terrible AJ Jenkins is. The difference is that you actually are a troll, trying to get a reaction, and AJ Jenkins isn't even remotely close to the biggest 1st round draft pick of all time (especially considering he was chosen 30th overall which him pretty close to a second round pick).
However, what is far less debatable is the all time greatest free agent bust. And that award goes to Kevin Kolb and his 6 year 65 million dollar contract without ever having done anything in his career.....
Stop deflecting.
I'm not so sure. I've been watching football for a long, long time and I never remember seeing a first round pick who could not even make the game day roster. That's unheard of; especially when two of your receivers went down for the season.
Would you ever consider the idea of not making shit up to fit your agenda?
he played in 3 games last year, so he obviously made the game day roster.
Although there is a guy who was drafted by the Redskins in the first round who actually did not play a single snap for them.
Hey little birdy, who had to whine to me in a private message, had you shown any intelligence or had common sense, you'd have looked up the Tackle like I did in 3 minutes and known it happened in
1996, like I did.
Instead, you tossed it around like it was LAST year. So I ask you again, who gives a rats @$$ what
happened in 1996?
Stay on topic.
AJ Jenkins stinks and should not make it on the 2013 9er roster. Isn't that the real purpose of this
thread?
Yes, it is.... Spin it, divert it, do whatever you do, but look your stat up next time or don't even
bother bringing up something almost 20 years ago...
Wait, I get it now. You bring that up like you do the last 9er SB win... Got it...
There are 2 questions, you're right about that:
1. What WRs belong on the Niners' roster for week 1.
2. How far ahead of AJ Jenkins is Aaron Curry in the bust race?
There are 2 questions, you're right about that:
1. What WRs belong on the Niners' roster for week 1.
2. How far ahead of AJ Jenkins is Aaron Curry in the bust race?
You're clearly a little bit slow, so let me reintroduce you to the conversation we are having in this thread:
See, when people say, "of all time," and "a long, long time" that strongly suggests that they are not talking about last year. Obviously you missed that. I suspect it's because you are an idiot. Three was probably trying to be gracious about it, so he PMed you rather than calling you out in front of the whole board.
Instead of quietly slinking away, as a good troll should do upon being humiliated, you have decided to double down on your stupidity. Congrats. You're officially the dumbest poster on this message board. Now I'm left hoping that you don't actually have an affiliation with UW, cause I don't want to feel dumber by association.
Finally, I'm all for nostalgia. But it shouldn't be one-sided. By all means, let's talk about the last time the Hawks won the super bowl.
Problem with including busts like Aaron Curry, is that Curry was actually able to be good enough to earn playing time to get onto the field and prove that he stinks....
Jenkins can't even do that. He's being outpaced by practice squad players on a team that needs WR's badly...
but a good comparison.. although MANY pundits felt that Curry was a top 5 pick. He was rated highly (although not be me) by most experts, because he "looked the part".
I live in Raleigh... watch a bunch of Wake Forsest Football, and he was hardly impressive in a weak sauce ACC. He was not the player that people were claiming to be, and both Osprey and I saw this on film. I didn't understand why they felt he was such a good prospect outside of his measurables...
Jenkins was sort of the same... He really didn't have an impressive career... He had a nice senior season, but... really made his living in TWO games against VASTLY inferior opponents, and after that was basically an average college receiver.... He had nice straight line speed... but he wasn't strong, wasn't big.. and really, kind of a head scratcher.
Birdy PM'd me a couple of weeks ago when I torched Breaker on a topic.
I'm not humiliated at all. If birdy had any sense, he'd have taken 2 seconds to list the guys name and the year he was drafted. It sounded like he was referring to last season. Don't you believe that's appropriate when you're trying to corroborate your opinion? I'd say yes, that's how we roll on the Hawks board.
That is why I called BS. That's nothing to be humiliated about when he couldn't list the guys name or the year he was talking about. All birdy said was some guy from the Redskins. Some guy?
Common sense says AJ isn't the worst draft pick because he was drafted at #30.
I don't care what anyone else said in the thread, I was calling BS on Birdy saying the Skins which he wasn't specific on and I took it as last year. BFD... You're making a big deal over that? really?
Look, you got confused. The only thing making it a big deal is you lashing out and acting like a little bitch. If you are surprised that, in the context of a conversation about "all-time draft busts," someone mentioned a guy who played 17 years ago without listing his draft year, get ready for a life of disappointment.
Hey little birdy, who had to whine to me in a private message, had you shown any intelligence or had common sense, you'd have looked up the Tackle like I did in 3 minutes and known it happened in
1996, like I did.
Instead, you tossed it around like it was LAST year. So I ask you again, who gives a rats @$$ what
happened in 1996?
Stay on topic.
AJ Jenkins stinks and should not make it on the 2013 9er roster. Isn't that the real purpose of this
thread?
Yes, it is.... Spin it, divert it, do whatever you do, but look your stat up next time or don't even
bother bringing up something almost 20 years ago...
Wait, I get it now. You bring that up like you do the last 9er SB win... Got it...
Reasons AJ Jenkins could make the Week 1 roster:
1) His money is guaranteed. Cutting him saves nothing and you have to pay his replacement.
2) The guys at #53 and #54 on the depth chart aren't as likely to be in areas of weakness where depth is needed.
3) The #5 or #6 WR isn't likely to produce much on any team. All the player has to do is be a decoy/threat to prevent the opposition from playing their last string S or LB against him.
4) Since the last WR rarely produces it's probably better to go with someone who has a higher potential upside than someone who is currently better but has reached their peak.
5) Teams are normally healthy at the start of the season so roster spots are less critical. A decision on Jenkins could be delayed a few weeks until injuries kick in and the roster spot is needed.
He may well survive the whole season if he shows some potential and effort.
There are 2 questions, you're right about that:
1. What WRs belong on the Niners' roster for week 1.
2. How far ahead of AJ Jenkins is Aaron Curry in the bust race?
The Raiders cut Asomugha.
The Eagles cut Asomugha.
If you've got 3 people who look better why keep him since his $1.75M contract isn't guaranteed? If you haven't then you keep him!
The Raiders had an option to keep him which they declined to exercise. It's splitting hairs. The Rams had an option to keep Steven Jackson at $7M which they declined to exercise. The Rams gave Jackson the opportunity to decline the deal first so that he could leave without being cut. I'm not an Asomugha fan. I don't see him as a team player, but you go with the best you've got.1. The Raiders never cut him.
Birdy PM'd me a couple of weeks ago when I torched Breaker on a topic.
The Raiders had an option to keep him which they declined to exercise. It's splitting hairs. The Rams had an option to keep Steven Jackson at $7M which they declined to exercise. The Rams gave Jackson the opportunity to decline the deal first so that he could leave without being cut. I'm not an Asomugha fan. I don't see him as a team player, but you go with the best you've got.